Am 03.05.2013 13:13, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> OK, also is not normal the number of updates in upstream .
>> Anyway could someone give karma for a bunch of security updates ?
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6999/kernel-3.8.1
On Sex, 2013-05-03 at 07:13 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Qui, 2013-05-02 at 15:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:01 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> > On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 15:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2013-05-02 at 15:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:01 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> > On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 15:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> > > this one is no longer relevant and if there would be a karma
On Qui, 2013-05-02 at 15:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:01 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 15:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > this one is no longer relevant and if there would be a karma-option
> > > in koji i would have given as i rolled out
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:01 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 15:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > this one is no longer relevant and if there would be a karma-option
> > in koji i would have given as i rolled out 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86_64
> > in production
>
> But 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86
On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 15:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> this one is no longer relevant and if there would be a karma-option
> in koji i would have given as i rolled out 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86_64
> in production
But 3.8.8-102.fc17.x86_64 is not pushed to updates-testing .
Meanwhile kernel-3.8.8-100.
Am 27.04.2013 15:54, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 10:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> They get pushed to stable once they've had enough positive testing
>> karma so why don't you install a test kernel and apply karma to ensure
>> it does go through to stable quicker.
>
> The
On Sáb, 2013-04-27 at 10:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> > we have two kernels build on F18 that fix security problems and in F17
> > kernel-3.8.8-100.fc17 still in updates-testing and kernel-3.8.8-102.fc17
> > is not even in update
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> we have two kernels build on F18 that fix security problems and in F17
> kernel-3.8.8-100.fc17 still in updates-testing and kernel-3.8.8-102.fc17
> is not even in updates testing, shouldn't this kernels be push to
> stable , due a securi
Hi,
we have two kernels build on F18 that fix security problems and in F17
kernel-3.8.8-100.fc17 still in updates-testing and kernel-3.8.8-102.fc17
is not even in updates testing, shouldn't this kernels be push to
stable , due a security fixes ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo