Getting closer, now just test 86 is segfaulting...
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/p
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 14:35:52 -0600
Richard Shaw wrote:
> What's the best way to modify the flags? I tried this but it bombed out...
>
> %ifarch ppc64le
> %global optflags "%{optflags} -fno-inline-small-functions"
> %endif
I believe you need to omit the quotes
Dan
__
What's the best way to modify the flags? I tried this but it bombed out...
%ifarch ppc64le
%global optflags "%{optflags} -fno-inline-small-functions"
%endif
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:53 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> No, I haven't tried building on one of the packager ppc boxes to investigate
> further. Fighting other gcc 12 / python 3.10/3.11 issues :)
>
> Did you add the flag for ppc64le only? I'll try and see if it fixes things
> for me as well.
Yes, f
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 10:40 AM Jerry James wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 9:38 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I thought the gcc 12 related issues with ppc64le had been fixed but
> perhaps not in all cases?
> >
> > On the original rebuild[1] two tests failed (segfaulting) but on my
> latest attemp
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 9:38 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> I thought the gcc 12 related issues with ppc64le had been fixed but perhaps
> not in all cases?
>
> On the original rebuild[1] two tests failed (segfaulting) but on my latest
> attempt with the new gcc 12 build[2] I now have 3 tests segfaulti
I thought the gcc 12 related issues with ppc64le had been fixed but perhaps
not in all cases?
On the original rebuild[1] two tests failed (segfaulting) but on my latest
attempt with the new gcc 12 build[2] I now have 3 tests segfaulting.
Thanks,
Richard
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//wo
