Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Well, in this case, an array of char is initialised with values > 128
> and the passed to XCreatePixmapFromBitmapData, which requires a char *
> parameter, so it's not trivial (at least to me).
These narrowing issues are all trivial to fix:
export CXXFLAGS="
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 14:45, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/18/2016 01:54 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 at 17:37, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>On 02/17/2016 02:54 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >>>Hello,
> >>>I'm orphaning the dx and
On 02/18/2016 01:54 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 at 17:37, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/17/2016 02:54 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hello,
I'm orphaning the dx and dx-samples in rawhide.
[...]
Feel free to take it (and request other branc
On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 at 17:37, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 02:54 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >Hello,
> >I'm orphaning the dx and dx-samples in rawhide.
[...]
> >Feel free to take it (and request other branches/admin access). I'll
> >give away the other branches a
On 02/17/2016 02:54 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hello,
I'm orphaning the dx and dx-samples in rawhide.
It is FTBFS in rawhide due to stricter checks in gcc-6, the upstream
is dead (or actually it was never there, ever since IBM released the
code), and the code itself is ancient (19
On 02/17/2016 03:09 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 at 15:00, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
Hello,
I'm orphaning the dx and dx-samples in rawhide.
It is FTBFS in raw
On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 at 15:00, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I'm orphaning the dx and dx-samples in rawhide.
> >
> > It is FTBFS in rawhide due to stricter checks in gcc-6, the ups
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm orphaning the dx and dx-samples in rawhide.
>
> It is FTBFS in rawhide due to stricter checks in gcc-6, the upstream
> is dead (or actually it was never there, ever since IBM released th
Hello,
I'm orphaning the dx and dx-samples in rawhide.
It is FTBFS in rawhide due to stricter checks in gcc-6, the upstream
is dead (or actually it was never there, ever since IBM released the
code), and the code itself is ancient (1999). I don't use it and I don't
know anyone who does, so it's no
