Re: passwd license clarification

2012-12-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:09:29PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > From the COPYING file, it looks like the actual intention is to license > > under a BSD license with an exception for converting to GPL. But, Since the > > three-clause BSD license is used, it's my understanding that that's not > >

Re: passwd license clarification

2012-12-04 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:09:52PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> the "passwd" package has contained >> License: BSD or GPLv2+ >> however, there is no "version 2 or later" clause in any of the >> copyright notices. So I've just updated it

Re: passwd license clarification

2012-12-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:09:52PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > the "passwd" package has contained > License: BSD or GPLv2+ > however, there is no "version 2 or later" clause in any of the > copyright notices. So I've just updated it to > License: BSD or GPL+ > and will build this in F18 and

passwd license clarification

2012-12-04 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Hello, per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#License_Changes ... the "passwd" package has contained License: BSD or GPLv2+ however, there is no "version 2 or later" clause in any of the copyright notices. So I've just updated it to License: BSD or GPL+ and will build