So any new progress here?
I haven't seen any updates still so far.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
python3-cairo is a separate package, it contains the latest upstream
release 1.10.0
but it looks like the License is wrong in the .spec (License: MPLv1.1 or
LGPLv2)
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python3-cairo/sources/spec/
from upstream homepage
pycairo is licensed under the GNU Lesser
request to be completed:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pycairo.git/commit/?id=c700bd496bee56d8f0de03ef4d57a34d1a97bcf0
It seems that the Provides and Obsoletes were done properly.
So there are still two issues:
1. open bug
2. python-cairo is still using pycairo repository name
Essentially
there are still two issues:
1. open bug
2. python-cairo is still using pycairo repository name
Essentially, the renaming isn't finished.
Right. So, I would suggest:
Since the rename review is stalled, someone update and submit a new
rename review (closing the old one as a duplicate) then get
on pycairo
might also want such on the new python-cairo, as long as whoever
submits the new rename review is ok with adding any of them that want
it, I don't see an issue.
I hope one of these people(also in python3-cairo) can submit a new review
request.
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:27:22AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi list,
I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of
pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its
rebuild(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005447) as well.
However the version in Fedora
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 05:21 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:27:22AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi list,
I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of
pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its
rebuild(https
. But now as name change bug has been posted for
years(from f15 era, then dup of this one), we should think about both
simultaneously.
All comaintainers of this package are not willing to do that:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pycairo
alexl
caillon
caolanm
hadess
mclasen
rhughes
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for the rename
review request to be completed:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pycairo.git/commit/?id=c700bd496bee56d8f0de03ef4d57a34d1a97bcf0
And I
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 11:46 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for the rename
review request to be completed:
Hi list,
I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of
pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its
rebuild(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005447) as well.
However the version in Fedora hasn't been updated for more than a
year, and also there is a name
11 matches
Mail list logo