Re: pycairo

2013-11-03 Thread Christopher Meng
So any new progress here? I haven't seen any updates still so far. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: pycairo

2013-10-24 Thread tim.laurid...@gmail.com
python3-cairo is a separate package, it contains the latest upstream release 1.10.0 but it looks like the License is wrong in the .spec (License: MPLv1.1 or LGPLv2) https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python3-cairo/sources/spec/ from upstream homepage pycairo is licensed under the GNU Lesser

Re: pycairo

2013-10-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
request to be completed: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pycairo.git/commit/?id=c700bd496bee56d8f0de03ef4d57a34d1a97bcf0 It seems that the Provides and Obsoletes were done properly. So there are still two issues: 1. open bug 2. python-cairo is still using pycairo repository name Essentially

Re: pycairo

2013-10-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
there are still two issues: 1. open bug 2. python-cairo is still using pycairo repository name Essentially, the renaming isn't finished. Right. So, I would suggest: Since the rename review is stalled, someone update and submit a new rename review (closing the old one as a duplicate) then get

Re: pycairo

2013-10-23 Thread Christopher Meng
on pycairo might also want such on the new python-cairo, as long as whoever submits the new rename review is ok with adding any of them that want it, I don't see an issue. I hope one of these people(also in python3-cairo) can submit a new review request. -- devel mailing list devel

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:27:22AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi list, I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its rebuild(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005447) as well. However the version in Fedora

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 05:21 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:27:22AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi list, I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its rebuild(https

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Christopher Meng
. But now as name change bug has been posted for years(from f15 era, then dup of this one), we should think about both simultaneously. All comaintainers of this package are not willing to do that: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pycairo alexl caillon caolanm hadess mclasen rhughes

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Christopher Meng
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for the rename review request to be completed: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pycairo.git/commit/?id=c700bd496bee56d8f0de03ef4d57a34d1a97bcf0 And I

Re: pycairo

2013-10-22 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 11:46 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for the rename review request to be completed:

pycairo

2013-10-19 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi list, I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its rebuild(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005447) as well. However the version in Fedora hasn't been updated for more than a year, and also there is a name