gt;> >>
>> >
>> > If all the reverse dependencies of Mercurial in Fedora are made ready
>> > in time, we probably could. But that's still past the expected release
>> > date for Fedora 30.
>> >
>> > Mercurial 4.9 is supposed to be Fe
dencies of Mercurial in Fedora are made ready
in time, we probably could. But that's still past the expected release
date for Fedora 30.
Mercurial 4.9 is supposed to be Fedora 30, so I think the only thing
we can do is allow python-zstd in the distribution with an exception
to allow including
all the reverse dependencies of Mercurial in Fedora are made ready
> > in time, we probably could. But that's still past the expected release
> > date for Fedora 30.
> >
> > Mercurial 4.9 is supposed to be Fedora 30, so I think the only thing
> > we can do is allo
SCo is needed.
>>
>> Can we instead update to directly to hg 5.0 in May and switch to Python
>> 3?
>>
>
> If all the reverse dependencies of Mercurial in Fedora are made ready
> in time, we probably could. But that's still past the expected release
> date
switch to Python 3?
>
If all the reverse dependencies of Mercurial in Fedora are made ready
in time, we probably could. But that's still past the expected release
date for Fedora 30.
Mercurial 4.9 is supposed to be Fedora 30, so I think the only thing
we can do is allow python-zstd in the
On 08. 04. 19 13:28, Neal Becker wrote:
mercurial 4.9 packages zstd and python wrapper.
I think we need to use system zstd. But I don't see python2-zstd.
Is anyone working on packaging python2-zstd? It would be needed to proceed
with mercurial 4.9. (I haven't yet checked on version number
co
mercurial 4.9 packages zstd and python wrapper.
I think we need to use system zstd. But I don't see python2-zstd.
Is anyone working on packaging python2-zstd? It would be needed to proceed
with mercurial 4.9. (I haven't yet checked on version number
compatibility).
Thanks,
Neal
