Le Dim 17 juin 2012 02:46, Paul Wouters a écrit :
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> On 06/15/2012 05:03 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
yum install rpm-build should install an rpmbuild version that works
as expected for fedora. Currently, it does not because it is missing the
>>
Paul Wouters wrote, at 06/17/2012 09:46 AM +9:00:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/15/2012 05:03 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
yum install rpm-build should install an rpmbuild version that works
as expected for fedora. Currently, it does not because it is missing the
dependancy on r
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/15/2012 05:03 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
yum install rpm-build should install an rpmbuild version that works
as expected for fedora. Currently, it does not because it is missing the
dependancy on redhat-rpm-config.
Well I tend to agree: it would
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Kratochvil"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:35:19 AM
> Subject: Re: redhat-rpm-config and rpm-build (fwd)
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:03:59 +0200, Jens Pet
On 06/15/2012 05:03 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
yum install rpm-build should install an rpmbuild version that works
as expected for fedora. Currently, it does not because it is missing the
dependancy on redhat-rpm-config.
Well I tend to agree: it would be the least surprising behaviour for most
f
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:03:59 +0200, Jens Petersen wrote:
> Well I tend to agree: it would be the least surprising behaviour for most
> fedora packagers.
> Though I understand the point about keeping rpmbuild generic -
> I don't see how pulling in redhat-rpm-config would break generic rpms?
> Surel
> yum install rpm-build should install an rpmbuild version that works
> as expected for fedora. Currently, it does not because it is missing the
> dependancy on redhat-rpm-config.
Well I tend to agree: it would be the least surprising behaviour for most
fedora packagers.
Though I understand the p
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, John5342 wrote:
In my opinion they are in order. From what you said rpm-build did
exactly what it was supposed to according to upstream. By then adding
our Fedora/Redhat specific configuration it does what _Fedora_ wants.
But the fedora rpm-build should work for fedora. We
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, John5342 wrote:
>
>>> Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
>>
>>
>> I imagine because rpmbuild is in fact useful for building packages
>> other than for Fedora.
>
>
> But then those packages n
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, John5342 wrote:
Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
I imagine because rpmbuild is in fact useful for building packages
other than for Fedora.
But then those packages need to provide some set of macros for debuginfo
packages, so there is som
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> I was building a package and not getting any debuginfo packages, and
> luckily rdieter was around to tell me (again) that I was missing the
> redhat-rpm-config package.
>
> Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
I was building a package and not getting any debuginfo packages, and
luckily rdieter was around to tell me (again) that I was missing the
redhat-rpm-config package.
Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
12 matches
Mail list logo
