On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:23:48AM -0400, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
> On Wed Sep 26 08:02:05, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > yes, and that is why statistics of mirrors are meaningsless
> > because of this fact my idea to give us a config-option
> > "dear yum, if the selected mirror provides lower than
> >
Am 03.10.2012 16:23, schrieb Zdenek Pavlas:
> On Wed Sep 26 08:02:05, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> yes, and that is why statistics of mirrors are meaningsless
>> because of this fact my idea to give us a config-option
>> "dear yum, if the selected mirror provides lower than
>> 500 KB/sek try another
On Wed Sep 26 08:02:05, Reindl Harald wrote:
> yes, and that is why statistics of mirrors are meaningsless
> because of this fact my idea to give us a config-option
> "dear yum, if the selected mirror provides lower than
> 500 KB/sek try another one because my line can 12 MB/sec"
FWIW, we've incr
Reindl Harald wrote:
> i am here at vienna ona glass fiber
>
> * 4 hops UPC
> * 4 hops Vienna University Computer Center - ACOne
>
> and the same from a 100 Mbit UPC-Fiber-Power at the
> other end of the city - not realistic that it would be
> faster anywhere in austria
FYI, try hardcoding mirro
Am 26.09.2012 06:05, schrieb Daniel Veillard:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:14:58PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 10:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> [...]
>> I think some of Harald's other suggestions in the mail are pretty good,
>> though. It does seem like yum could try h
In Beijing,I think maybe better though I used to live near a fedora repo
and the download never comes from that server because of the bad connection
between different ISPs.
And this case really makes many users complaining "Update repos are
slow!!!".
Anyway,ISPs,like China Telecom,China Unicom an
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:14:58PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 10:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[...]
> I think some of Harald's other suggestions in the mail are pretty good,
> though. It does seem like yum could try harder to throw out slow
> mirrors. It is a bit annoying
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:14:58PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 10:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:54:34 +0200
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > > since some weeks "gd.tuwien.ac.at" is creeping around
> > > 2-30 KB/second and i am sitting on 100 MBi
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 10:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:54:34 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > since some weeks "gd.tuwien.ac.at" is creeping around
> > 2-30 KB/second and i am sitting on 100 MBit WAN
> >
> > currently 68 BYTE per second on a test-vm
> >
> > since yum d
Am 25.09.2012 18:34, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:54:34 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> since some weeks "gd.tuwien.ac.at" is creeping around
>> 2-30 KB/second and i am sitting on 100 MBit WAN
>>
>> currently 68 BYTE per second on a test-vm
>>
>> since yum does no longer suppor
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:54:34 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> since some weeks "gd.tuwien.ac.at" is creeping around
> 2-30 KB/second and i am sitting on 100 MBit WAN
>
> currently 68 BYTE per second on a test-vm
>
> since yum does no longer support switching a mirror
> with STRG+C https://bugzilla.
since some weeks "gd.tuwien.ac.at" is creeping around
2-30 KB/second and i am sitting on 100 MBit WAN
currently 68 BYTE per second on a test-vm
since yum does no longer support switching a mirror
with STRG+C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860181
this such mirrors should be removed or
12 matches
Mail list logo
