Re: request for more visible KDE netinstall

2015-09-19 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, On Sex, 2015-09-18 at 10:29 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:31:13AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > > > But, it's really that the netinstall is hard to find from the KDE page. > > > It's reasonably easy to find if you know what to look for on > > >

Re: request for more visible KDE netinstall

2015-09-18 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:31:13AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > > But, it's really that the netinstall is hard to find from the KDE page. > > It's reasonably easy to find if you know what to look for on > > . > > Eh, you *should not* need to know whe

Re: request for more visible KDE netinstall

2015-09-18 Thread Petr Spacek
On 17.9.2015 16:28, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:03:16AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> This came in in Bugzilla filed against the >>> fedora-productimg-workstation, which isn't the right place for it, so >>> I'm passing it on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12635

Re: request for more visible KDE netinstall

2015-09-17 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:03:16AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > This came in in Bugzilla filed against the > > fedora-productimg-workstation, which isn't the right place for it, so > > I'm passing it on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263565 > Well , after some analyze the bug repor

Re: request for more visible KDE netinstall

2015-09-16 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, On Qua, 2015-09-16 at 08:49 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > This came in in Bugzilla filed against the > fedora-productimg-workstation, which isn't the right place for it, so > I'm passing it on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263565 Well , after some analyze the bug report is