Thomas Spura wrote:
> I don't see a benefit of that... When a build fails, it kills all
> other current builds of other architectures, so you need to check that
> architecture, that fails first and the diff would not contain the error.
Even just comparing successful builds can be useful, e.g. to m
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:20 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> On 21/06/10 09:38, Thomas Spura wrote:
> >> Any comments (other than 'show me the money/code') ?
> >
> > I don't see a benefit of that... When a build fails, it kills all
> > other current builds of other architectures, so you need to check th
On 21/06/10 09:38, Thomas Spura wrote:
>> Any comments (other than 'show me the money/code') ?
>
> I don't see a benefit of that... When a build fails, it kills all
> other current builds of other architectures, so you need to check that
> architecture, that fails first and the diff would not conta
Am Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:32:07 +1000
schrieb David Timms :
> Probably thought of a million times, but was wondering whether it
> would be possible, and useful to give diff capabilities within the
> koji web interface.
>
> eg: x86_64 build
> ...
> Output build.log (tail)
> root.log (tail)
Probably thought of a million times, but was wondering whether it would
be possible, and useful to give diff capabilities within the koji web
interface.
eg: x86_64 build
...
Output build.log (tail)
root.log (tail)
state.log (tail)
could become:
Output build.log (tail) (dif
