separation emacs-common into more packages

2013-09-10 Thread Petr Hracek
Hi folks, I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide currently). emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages Do you think that it is a good idea to separate them into groups like emacs-org (directory /usr/share/emacs/24.3/lisp/org) emacs-progmodes (direct

Re: separation emacs-common into more packages

2013-09-10 Thread Ales Kozumplik
On 09/10/2013 01:54 PM, Petr Hracek wrote: Hi folks, I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide currently). emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages Do you think that it is a good idea to separate them into groups like emacs-org (directory /usr/share/em

Re: separation emacs-common into more packages

2013-09-10 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:54:47 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide > currently). > emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages > Do you think that it is a good idea to separate them into groups like > > emacs-

Re: separation emacs-common into more packages

2013-09-10 Thread Petr Hracek
On 09/10/2013 02:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:54:47 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote: Hi folks, I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide currently). emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages Do you think that it is a good idea to sepa

Re: separation emacs-common into more packages

2013-09-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/10/2013 01:54 PM, Petr Hracek wrote: Hi folks, I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide currently). emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages Man pages and infos should be part of the package they document. They do not belong into "*-common".

Re: separation emacs-common into more packages

2013-09-10 Thread 80
Hi, as an emacs user, splitting emacs-common has little value to me, and without a package requiring most of the splitted packages, it might even turn into an annoyance (much like texlive). My 2cts Best regards. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: separation emacs-common into more packages

2013-09-10 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 09/10/2013 10:06 AM, 80 wrote: as an emacs user, splitting emacs-common has little value to me, and without a package requiring most of the splitted packages, it might even turn into an annoyance (much like texlive). Yeah, 4872 packages reported by repoquery texlive*. That's over 12% of