Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-05-06 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Thursday 06 May 2010, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: > On 05/06/2010 01:28 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote: > > - "Ivana Varekova" wrote: > >> Sorry for the late response, this solution seems fine for me. From my > >> > >> point of view man and man-db sould provide man-reader. > >> Ivana > > > > H

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-05-05 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
On 05/06/2010 01:28 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote: > - "Ivana Varekova" wrote: > > >> Sorry for the late response, this solution seems fine for me. From my >> >> point of view man and man-db sould provide man-reader. >> Ivana >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> https:

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-05-05 Thread Ding Yi Chen
- "Ivana Varekova" wrote: > Sorry for the late response, this solution seems fine for me. From my > > point of view man and man-db sould provide man-reader. > Ivana > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Has man-p

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-04-01 Thread Ivana Varekova
On 03/10/2010 05:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 14:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> There is no strong dependency between "man" and "man-pages". >> >> "man" is just one utility amongst many utilities which can be used to >> process man-pages. >> > Perhaps it would

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-10 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 11:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/10/2010 11:40 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: > > from my point of view, the vast majority of users uses man to show the > > wanted man-page content (the reason to add the dependency). > > Agreed. > > Actually, I am having proble

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-10 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 14:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > There is no strong dependency between "man" and "man-pages". > > "man" is just one utility amongst many utilities which can be used to > process man-pages. Perhaps it would make sense to introduce a Provides:(man-reader) or some such

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/10/2010 11:40 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: > On 03/08/2010 02:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 03/08/2010 11:25 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: >> >>> For now in fedora there are 11 packages which contains language >>> mutations of man-pages (man-pages-{cs,da,de,es,fr,it,ja

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-10 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
On 03/08/2010 02:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/08/2010 11:25 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: > >>For now in fedora there are 11 packages which contains language >> mutations of man-pages (man-pages-{cs,da,de,es,fr,it,ja,ko,pl,ru,uk}) >> and man-pages package. >>Only 2

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-08 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/08/2010 11:25 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: > For now in fedora there are 11 packages which contains language > mutations of man-pages (man-pages-{cs,da,de,es,fr,it,ja,ko,pl,ru,uk}) > and man-pages package. > Only 2 of them (man-pages-es, man-pages-it) requires man package. I

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-08 Thread Alain Portal
Le Lundi 8 Mars 2010 11:25:40, Ivana Hutarova Varekova a écrit : > For now in fedora there are 11 packages which contains language > mutations of man-pages (man-pages-{cs,da,de,es,fr,it,ja,ko,pl,ru,uk}) > and man-pages package. > Only 2 of them (man-pages-es, man-pages-it) requires man pa

should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-08 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
For now in fedora there are 11 packages which contains language mutations of man-pages (man-pages-{cs,da,de,es,fr,it,ja,ko,pl,ru,uk}) and man-pages package. Only 2 of them (man-pages-es, man-pages-it) requires man package. I think man dependences should be consistent in all man-pages*