Hello,
I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
distributions. I would like to ask, if you could update syslog-ng to
version 3.1. I'm working on the openSUSE version of syslog-ng 3.1 (
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/czanik:/branches:/Ba
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:02:54PM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote:
> Version 3.0 also added SSL support among many other changes, but that
> can't be enabled on openSUSE (configure arg: --disable-ssl): syslog-ng
> is in /sbin, openssl libs are in /usr/lib, linking from /usr is not
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
> distributions. I would like to ask, if you could update syslog-ng to
> version 3.1. I'm working o
Hello,
2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>> dist
Hello,
Quick heads up: version 3.1.1 of syslog-ng is now available, which among
other things fixes a problem with pipe(). In 3.X, pipe used 100% CPU,
when a file parameter was used instead of a pipe (as was in the default
openSUSE syslog-ng.conf).
Bye,
CzP
2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J
Hello,
2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>> dist
t;
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>>> distributions. I would like to ask, if you could update syslog-ng to
>>> version 3.1. I'm working on the openSUSE version of syslog-ng 3.1 (
>>&
Hello,
2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
>> syslog-ng) updated to the latest available version. First I tried to
>> contact the original syslog-ng packagers directly, but I got no response
On 02/06/10 11:56, Peter Czanik wrote:
--snip--
>
> And a bonus question, as I work now for the upstream developer of
> syslog-ng: what was the reason for dropping syslog-ng from the distribution?
>
> Bye,
> CzP
No idea but this is when rsyslog was mooted.
http://www.redhat.c
Hello,
2010-06-02 12:56 keltezéssel, Peter Czanik írta:
>
> So the question is modified: how can I get it (and the supporting
> packages) back into Fedora. I have now updated the syslog-ng spec file
> from Fedora 12 to syslog-ng version 3.1.1 and compiled with mock on FC12
> F
On 06/02/2010 12:56 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
>>> syslog-ng) updated to the latest available version. First I tried to
>>>
2010-06-02 14:02 keltezéssel, Petr Lautrbach írta:
> On 06/02/2010 12:56 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>>
>>>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
2010-06-02 14:02 keltezéssel, Petr Lautrbach írta:
> On 06/02/2010 12:56 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>>
>>>> I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
> Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
> What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request? Is
> there maintainer a timeout, like with FreeBSD? Or I have to wait patiently
> until something happens? I was su
2010-06-10 15:10 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta:
> On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
>> What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request?
>> Is there maintainer a timeout, like with FreeBSD? Or I
but no Fedora infrastructure experience...
>>
> I responded to the original bug and closed the non-responsive maintainer bug.
>
> The updated package was published as a tgz file which made it difficult to see
> what was being changed in the spec file; a link to the new spec
Hello,
2010-06-11 18:44 keltezéssel, Doug Warner írta:
> To be honest, maintaining syslog-ng (while I use it all the time) is a
> very
> tiring process; there isn't much "support" for multiple sysloggers in Fedora
> and it was a real pain to get everyone cooperati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
syslog-ng is an alternative syslog daemon that provides high flexibility and a
great configuration syntax. I've done a lot of work to make sure this is
parallel-installable with the other syslog daemons, but lately I haven't had
the time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
we all know, the final change freeze arrives tomorrow, May 9th.
I would like to ask you, if you could provide some (positive) karma for
syslog-ng. It is the latest stable version and I'd like to pull it into
F15 before change f
Hello,
On 02/02/2011 03:24 PM, Doug Warner wrote:
> syslog-ng is an alternative syslog daemon that provides high
> flexibility and a
> great configuration syntax. I've done a lot of work to make sure this is
> parallel-installable with the other syslog daemons, but lately I
&g
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 22:15 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> we all know, the final change freeze arrives tomorrow, May 9th.
>
> I would like to ask you, if you could provide some (positive) karma for
> syslog-ng. It is the latest stable version and I'd lik
21 matches
Mail list logo
