Re: systemd: targets which are runlevel-like

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:36:54AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > $ systemd --test --system --unit=foobar.target > > This will dump you a lot of stuff, including, at the very end the > transaction it would execute when it would be booted with this target as > destination. > > This is mostly

Re: systemd: targets which are runlevel-like

2010-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 24.08.10 18:07, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:49:56PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > Wait, so "--all" doesn't actually show me all targets, it shows me an > > > apparently-arbitrary list of some of the possible targets? > > It shows you a

Re: systemd: targets which are runlevel-like

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:49:56PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Wait, so "--all" doesn't actually show me all targets, it shows me an > > apparently-arbitrary list of some of the possible targets? > It shows you all targets systemd knows about at that point in time. > The list of thinkable

Re: systemd: targets which are runlevel-like

2010-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 24.08.10 17:13, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:57:38PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Actually it only shows you the active targets, those which a pending > > job, and those which have failed before (i.e. the "interesting" > > ones). If you

Re: systemd: targets which are runlevel-like

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:57:38PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Actually it only shows you the active targets, those which a pending > job, and those which have failed before (i.e. the "interesting" > ones). If you pass --all it will show you inactive targets without > pending jobs which have

Re: systemd: targets which are runlevel-like

2010-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 24.08.10 12:31, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote: > As I was thinking about Bug 626840, I noticed something. With the current > runlevel system, it's easy to know what your options are. The systemd FAQ > helpfully explains that "systemctl isolate graphical.target" is the > replacem

systemd: targets which are runlevel-like

2010-08-24 Thread Matthew Miller
As I was thinking about Bug 626840, I noticed something. With the current runlevel system, it's easy to know what your options are. The systemd FAQ helpfully explains that "systemctl isolate graphical.target" is the replacement, and that "systemctl list-units --type=target" will show me the various