On Tue, 11.10.11 03:38, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
[Unit]
After=network.target
Before=remote-fs-pre.target
Wants=remote-fs-pre.target
This should appear in F16 soon.
This is now waiting in bodhi.
Would be cool if you could check if this works as intended for you!
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:18 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 10/05/2011 08:55 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Ok, excellent, so there is really just one issue to try and resolve in
that case I think, which is the ordering of mounts vs. gfs_controld
start,
Hum...
Could that be
On Wed, 05.10.11 09:55, Steven Whitehouse (swhit...@redhat.com) wrote:
The more complicated conversion is the gfs2 script. This has been used
historically to mount gfs2 filesystems (rather than using the system
scripts for this). I assume that under the new systemd regime it should
be
On Tue, 11.10.11 00:03, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
But anyway, I am aware that not all daemons are netlink aware and we
need to support that daemons like that and making them more dynamic is
not realistic in the short term. So what we could do is introduce a new
target
On 10/05/2011 12:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 04.10.11 15:02, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote:
I have a similar problem with some bind mounts over the root filesystem
where systemd mounts them while the rootfs is still ro and hence they
all wind up as ro until I remount them.
On 05/10/11 08:51, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 10/05/2011 12:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 04.10.11 15:02, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote:
I have a similar problem with some bind mounts over the root filesystem
where systemd mounts them while the rootfs is still ro and hence they
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 00:01 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 04.10.11 14:39, Steven Whitehouse (swhit...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hi,
Heya,
I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in
Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-utils
On 10/05/2011 08:55 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Ok, excellent, so there is really just one issue to try and resolve in
that case I think, which is the ordering of mounts vs. gfs_controld
start,
Hum...
Could that be solved either by creating mount/path units ( for the mount
point ) and or by
Hi,
I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in
Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-utils package to
the new init system and run into things which are not documented (so far
as I can tell).
Currently there are two init scripts in gfs2-utils, one is
On 10/04/2011 02:39 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in
Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-utils package to
the new init system and run into things which are not documented (so far
as I can tell).
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 14:54 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 10/04/2011 02:39 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in
Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-utils package to
the new init system and run
On 04/10/11 14:54, Paul Howarth wrote:
I ran into a similar problem last month. I foolishly set up a bind mount
for a local filesystem, with the new mountpoint living on top of an NFS
filesystem, and set it up in fstab to mount on boot in an F-16 VM. When
I next rebooted, the attempted bind
On Tue, 04.10.11 14:39, Steven Whitehouse (swhit...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hi,
Heya,
I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in
Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-utils package to
the new init system and run into things which are not documented
On Tue, 04.10.11 15:02, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote:
On 04/10/11 14:54, Paul Howarth wrote:
I ran into a similar problem last month. I foolishly set up a bind mount
for a local filesystem, with the new mountpoint living on top of an NFS
filesystem, and set it up in fstab to
On Wed, 05.10.11 00:18, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Tue, 04.10.11 15:02, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote:
On 04/10/11 14:54, Paul Howarth wrote:
I ran into a similar problem last month. I foolishly set up a bind mount
for a local filesystem, with the
15 matches
Mail list logo
