On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 04:24 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Even though luc has so many issues, and even though our Fedora wiki
guide [1] no longer lists is as the first option, I had the notion
that it was already *the tool* recommended by default. Because
fedoraproject.org only links to our docs
On Aug 29, 2014 5:21 AM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
To edit the
doc guide I'd have to go and deal with docbook and come up with a git
patch and submit it for review by docs team, which isn't really a
terribly high bar but is still harder than 'edit wiki page, now you're
So I want to inject a note of caution on this one. A few of us who deal
with boot stuff - me for QA purposes, mjg59 and pjones who actually know
what's going on, and lmacken who maintains luc right now - talked this
over a few months back, and what would like to do with luc is kill it,
or at
What about offering liveusb-creator at the first place instead of ISO?
Actually, this might be a great idea. Not instead, but if we provided two
buttons instead of one:
[Download DVD image] [Download USB installer]
people would immediately saw the difference. If they were after USB
Some ideas:
1. First and foremost, we should obviously consider whether we can make
some compose changes that would make the image more compatible with
third-party USB installers. That's very technical, but I hope relevant
people could provide some comments here.
I suppose we could
What about offering liveusb-creator at the first place instead of
ISO?
Actually, this might be a great idea. Not instead, but if we
provided two buttons instead of one:
[Download DVD image] [Download USB installer]
people would immediately saw the difference. If they were after USB
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 08:21 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
What about offering liveusb-creator at the first place instead of ISO?
Actually, this might be a great idea. Not instead, but if we provided two
buttons instead of one:
So I want to inject a note of caution on this one. A few of us who
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 12:06 -0700, Thomas C.Gilliard wrote:
Previous post:
A problem is that the .iso versions offered for download in the
liveusb-creator GUI always seem to lag behind.
So a technical note on this one: luc can actually retrieve an up to date
list of ISOs from the mirror
On 8/1/2014 12:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 12:06 -0700, Thomas C.Gilliard wrote:
Previous post:
A problem is that the .iso versions offered for download in the
liveusb-creator GUI always seem to lag behind.
So a technical note on this one: luc can actually retrieve
People,
On 2014-08-02 05:06, Thomas C.Gilliard wrote:
What about offering liveusb-creator at the first place instead of
ISO?
Actually, this might be a great idea. Not instead, but if we
provided two buttons instead of one:
[Download DVD image] [Download USB installer]
people would
It's a well-known fact in our circles that third-party USB conversion tools
(like UNetbootin or Universal USB Installer) can't create Fedora Live USB
correctly. Unfortunately, it is not well known among our users (I see it very
often on test list, IRC, or local fedora.cz website/forums) and
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:04:16AM -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Some ideas:
1. First and foremost, we should obviously consider whether we can make some
compose changes that would make the image more compatible with third-party
USB installers. That's very technical, but I hope relevant people
Longer term, would turning this stateless via new systemd features
be helpful?.
On 31 July 2014 18:13, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:04:16AM -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Some ideas:
1. First and foremost, we should obviously consider whether we can make some
13 matches
Mail list logo
