On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:47 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 08/16/2012 05:27 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a
legal reason for that?
twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems
to be a free (as
I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a
legal reason for that?
twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems
to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion
on Debian and they concluded that it's ok to have it on
On 08/16/2012 05:27 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a
legal reason for that?
twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems
to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion
on
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Nikos Roussos
comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a
legal reason for that?
twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to
be a free (as free of patents) codec.
