Hi,
Anyone want to review this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531
I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update.
Regards,
Greg
--
Vitamin C deficiency is apauling.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:13:46PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone want to review this one:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531
>
> I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update.
Questions ...
Are we going to obsolete these packages:
https://admin.fedo
Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 19:46:08 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:13:46PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone want to review this one:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531
> >
> > I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this u
On 09/27/2011 07:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison227
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison
>
> Instead of introducing yet another variation, can we somehow create
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:55:43AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 07:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison227
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:54 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:55:43AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > On 09/27/2011 07:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 10:20 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The problem here is that upstream has no desire to keep a common
> protocol, so you need the exact version on both ends. (If I recall
> correctly). So, if you have say a debian box with version foo, you
>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:10:32PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/28/2011 10:20 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The problem here is that upstream has no desire to keep a common
> > protocol, so you need the exact version on both ends. (If I recal
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:00:40 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> I checked the source code, and unison sends a header which contains
> the current major version number of the software (where "major
> version" is a string, currently "2.40"). If the major versions of
> each end don't exactly match
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:55:43AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> On 09/27/2011 07:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213
>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unis
On 2011-09-28 14:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:00:40 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>> I was thinking of something slightly simpler: a single 'unison'
>> package that contained several binaries, like /usr/bin/unison227,
>> /usr/bin/unison (symlink to latest).
>
> That does h
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
>
> One build could produce a package for each version. The packages'
> n-v-rs could then be maintained independently. I am not sure how bodhi
> would behave in such a case, though.
>
> This most certainly is not optimal; I'm simply throwi
On Thursday, 29 September 2011 at 15:38, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> >
> > One build could produce a package for each version. The packages'
> > n-v-rs could then be maintained independently. I am not sure how bodhi
> > would behave in such a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:50:04PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Example: we have unison-2.9-1 package which produces
> unison-2.9-1
> unison28-2.8-2
> unison21-2.1-5
>
> We want to update unison28, so the next build of unison-2.9-2 produces only:
> unison28-2.8.1-1
>
> What do
On Sep 29, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> One solution would be to make per-version subpackages conditional via macros
> and build only the one that has been updated.
>
> Example: we have unison-2.9-1 package which produces
> unison-2.9-1
> unison28-2.8-2
> unison21
On 09/28/2011 11:00 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I checked the source code, and unison sends a header which contains
> the current major version number of the software (where "major
> version" is a string, currently "2.40"). If the major versions of
> each end don't exactly match, unison aborts
Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 11:10:27 schrieb Tom Callaway:
> On 09/28/2011 11:00 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I checked the source code, and unison sends a header which contains
> > the current major version number of the software (where "major
> > version" is a string, currently "2.40").
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2011 01:38 PM, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> so many creative ideas ;)
>
> But I think such a program would be confusing to users: When
> someone wants to install unison, he expects the package will
> install unison and a menu entry. And not a unis
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011, 11:15:54 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:55:43AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > On 09/27/2011 07:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/a
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:22:28 +0200
Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> Any news from the FESCO team? What's the conclusion of this
> discussion?
No one has officially asked fesco...
Please file a ticket what you actually want to ask fesco here?
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/newtplticket
Personally, I th
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:32:18AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:22:28 +0200
> Gregor Tätzner wrote:
>
> > Any news from the FESCO team? What's the conclusion of this
> > discussion?
>
> No one has officially asked fesco...
>
> Please file a ticket what you actually want to
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2011, 20:26:11 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:32:18AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:22:28 +0200
> >
> > Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> > > Any news from the FESCO team? What's the conclusion of this
> > > discussion?
> >
> > No one h
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:05:09PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
>
> Another idea: Just put in the package *unison* the latest release and when a
> new shiny version has been released we provide a compat version, so move
> unison to *unisonXYZ* and update the *unison* package regularly.
>
> I su
Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 17:13:46 schrieb Gregor Tätzner:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone want to review this one:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531
>
> I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
The leaves are falling and F16 is coming soon. Neithe
24 matches
Mail list logo
