Re: unison updates

2011-04-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I should add: won't deltarpm just deal with changes to binary RPMs which aren't really changes? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn

Re: unison updates

2011-04-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:19:06PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:08:10PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote: > > On 04/19/2011 05:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Actually it looks like I was even lazier than that and just built it > > > from source. I seem to be running 2.

Re: unison updates

2011-04-29 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:08:10PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote: > On 04/19/2011 05:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Actually it looks like I was even lazier than that and just built it > > from source. I seem to be running 2.32.52. I just needed whatever > > version would interoperate with my Mand

Re: unison updates

2011-04-26 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 04/19/2011 05:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Actually it looks like I was even lazier than that and just built it > from source. I seem to be running 2.32.52. I just needed whatever > version would interoperate with my Mandriva machines. Good news is current unison builds just fine with the ex

Re: unison updates

2011-04-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 17:07 -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote: > On 04/19/2011 11:34 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > FWIW, I'm in this mess too, but I was lazy and decided to just hack up > > the spec to build the version I need locally rather than do anything to > > 'properly' fix up the packages. > >

Re: unison updates

2011-04-19 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 04/19/2011 03:35 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > However this > is a big pain to maintain, not least because whenever a new > incompatible version comes along we have to apply for a new Unison > package to be added to Fedora(!) Right, it's a shame there's no --protocol= flag. I'd assume, being

Re: unison updates

2011-04-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 08:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Since I don't know any OCaml and this package probably needs to > > combine 3 versions and label multiple binaries, I shouldn't > > volunteer to build this as my first package. But I'd be happy to do > > some manual builds and share

Re: unison updates

2011-04-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:18:23PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote: > Hi, Rich, > > I see that you got tagged as owner on the unison packages. Are you > planning to package any updates, or did you just inherit it by > default because of its OCaml nature? Pretty much I inherited it. > I was going to