On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 06:16, Jens Petersen wrote:
> Thanks for this feedback.
>
> Not sure what happened :-( but I am rebuilding them now (mkvtoolnix was
> expected).
Feel free to fix mkvtoolnix using the upstream patch I mentioned.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org
Thanks for this feedback.
Not sure what happened :-( but I am rebuilding them now (mkvtoolnix was
expected).
Cheers, Jens
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 17. 01. 23 6:55, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Currently we have an old version of cmark in Fedora: version 0.29.
I had several requests to update it to the latest release 0.30.2 from 2021.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974335
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 3:38 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 13:55 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> > So I plan to go ahead with this rebase and rebuilding these packages
> > after the mass rebuild if that's okay.
>
> Hi,
> does the new version change any API and/or
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 13:55 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> So I plan to go ahead with this rebase and rebuilding these packages
> after the mass rebuild if that's okay.
Hi,
does the new version change any API and/or soname version?
> We can consider whether to backport to F37 and
Currently we have an old version of cmark in Fedora: version 0.29.
I had several requests to update it to the latest release 0.30.2 from 2021.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974335
I created a copr repo for testing:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/cmark/
>From my
