Hi,
sorry for the very late test - kernel is unusable for me, appears to be the
same issue
as described here for F12:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581605
It is one of the typical netbooks - did anyone recently test the Intel graphic
on some of those devices? It is likely that t
On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 16:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 22:30 +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> > On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on
> > > the positive r
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 16:45 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on
> > the positive response here and on forums, we spun a new RC of the beta
> > with the -24 kernel incl
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on
> the positive response here and on forums, we spun a new RC of the beta
> with the -24 kernel included, so now if you still want to help testing,
> please test that
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 22:30 +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> [...]
> > Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on
> > the positive response here and on forums, we spun a new RC of the beta
> > with t
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 14:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
> that breaks boot on systems
On 04/07/2010 12:21 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:45:39 -0700 John Reiser wrote:
>> Then I did "rpm --erase" of -24 and "rpm --install" of -24, and the
>> message was: -
>> /sbin/new-kernel-pkg: line 289: 2334 Segmentation fault (core
>> dumped)
>
> Is it reproducible
Running ok here on my HP Pavilion dv9750ed lappy [dmesg attached]
dmesg
Description: Binary data
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Already running 2.6.33.1-26.fc13.i686 on my HP s3707c (AMD 5400+
Nvidia 9100 onboard) . No problems
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 works for me (amd64 system with nvidia chipset).
Regards,
Hans
On 04/06/2010 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2
Hi,
kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 works for me (amd64 system with nvidia chipset).
Regards,
Hans
On 04/06/2010 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2
On 06/04/10 23:22, Adam Williamson wrote:
Works fine on Dell Vostro 200 as factory minus included soft.
Kernel.x86_64
System i686
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit
CPU(s):1
Thread(s) per core:1
Core(s) per socket:1
CPU socket(s):
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:45:39 -0700 John Reiser wrote:
> Then I did "rpm --erase" of -24 and "rpm --install" of -24, and the
> message was: -
> /sbin/new-kernel-pkg: line 289: 2334 Segmentation fault (core
> dumped)
Is it reproducible if you run dracut by hand?:
dracut -f -v /boot/initram
On 04/06/2010 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wir
On 06-04-2010 18:53, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
> that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
> that breaks boot on systems wi
On 04/06/2010 04:11 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> dracut package provides /sbin/mkinitrd
>
> and you'll see that new-kernel-pkg gets called with --mkinitrd as well
> as --dracut in the kernel scriptlet for both referenced kernel builds.
>
> I don't think anything has changed in the scriptlet logic ther
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 14:53:04 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
> that breaks boot on
Reporting success, kernel -19 booted on this machine, and the new one does
as well. nvidia and cpu info below
# lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G86 [GeForce 8400M GS]
(rev a1)
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> That seems strange, it should use dracut, not mkinitrd at all? Is this
> an F13 system?
dracut package provides /sbin/mkinitrd
and you'll see that new-kernel-pkg gets called with --mkinitrd as well
as --dracut in the kernel scriptlet for b
On 04/06/2010 03:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> That seems strange, it should use dracut, not mkinitrd at all? Is this
> an F13 system?
/etc/fedora-release says "Fedora release 13 (Goddard)".
/etc/yum.repos.d has enabled repos for fedora, fedora-updates, and
fedora-updates-testing, using a baseur
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:45 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > Does kernel -19 work on the same system?
>
> Yes, -19 works on the same system.
>
> At first I did "yum localupdate --nogpg kernel-*". There was a warning about
> a POSTTRANS scriptlet failure, but yum did not abort. The boot hangs.
>
On 04/06/2010 03:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:29 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
>>> kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
>>
>> HANGS at boot: VGA console blank except for text cursor in upper left.
>> cpu family : 6
>> model: 23
>>
>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: A
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:29 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
>
> HANGS at boot: VGA console blank except for text cursor in upper left.
> cpu family: 6
> model : 23
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV710 [Radeon HD 4550]
> 01:00.0 0300:
> kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
HANGS at boot: VGA console blank except for text cursor in upper left.
cpu family : 6
model : 23
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV710 [Radeon HD 4550]
01:00.0 0300: 1002:9540
--
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:13 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
>
> Works for me on x86_64:
> cpu family: 15
> model : 47
>
> 05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G72 [GeForce 7300 SE]
> (rev a1)
> 05:00.0 0300: 10de:01d3 (rev a1)
Thanks, John.
--
> kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
Works for me on x86_64:
cpu family : 15
model : 47
05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G72 [GeForce 7300 SE]
(rev a1)
05:00.0 0300: 10de:01d3 (rev a1)
--
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters
supported by the b44 module.
28 matches
Mail list logo
