On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 6:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 05:58, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > If I get the motivation, I'll file a bug against the RPMFusion package.
>
> Here's the bug tracker: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/
Thanks.
>
> > As for the original issue regarding
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 05:58, Christopher wrote:
>
> If I get the motivation, I'll file a bug against the RPMFusion package.
Here's the bug tracker: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/
> As for the original issue regarding packaging: there is a ticket being
> tracked to get it upstream into the
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 23:47:53 -0400
Christopher wrote:
> I actually got it working with v4l2loopback. It normally works quite
That's great!
> well. But, changing settings still crashes.
That's not.
> Literally, all I have to do is: File -> Settings -> toggle any setting
> (just to make "Apply"
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:00 PM stan via devel
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:44:16 -0400
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > I'm probably going to abandon the effort anyway. obs-studio in Fedora
> > crashes constantly every time I try to change the settings and save,
> > so I couldn't figure out how to
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:35 AM Momčilo Medić
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 04:40 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:59 AM Iñaki Ucar
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher <
> > > ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > The previous packaging was on
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:44:16 -0400
Christopher wrote:
> I'm probably going to abandon the effort anyway. obs-studio in Fedora
> crashes constantly every time I try to change the settings and save,
> so I couldn't figure out how to get it to work with v4l2loopback. I
You are using obs in a
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 04:40 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:59 AM Iñaki Ucar
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher <
> > ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > The previous packaging was on COPR, but it appears abandoned,
> > > probably
> > > because it's
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:59 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > The previous packaging was on COPR, but it appears abandoned, probably
> > because it's kind of worthless if it's not signed. And, it's a lot of
> > manual work to self-sign and register
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 03:53, Christopher wrote:
>
> The previous packaging was on COPR, but it appears abandoned, probably
> because it's kind of worthless if it's not signed. And, it's a lot of
> manual work to self-sign and register the key with mokutil, and even
> more effort to figure out how
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 4:45 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I don't know enough about RPMFusion packaging. I use RPMFusion, but
> haven't looked into the contribution process. In particular, I wonder
> if their modules are signed by a key that's already trusted in Fedora.
> My guess is not, and then
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 4:45 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 22:23, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 22:23, Christopher wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > >
> > > Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
> >
> > Yes, they are:
> >
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 12:13 PM stan via devel
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:56:08 -0400
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tried packaging v4l2loopback into Fedora? I'd really like
> > to set up a screen capture device for video conferencing stuff, but I
> > keep running into problems
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
> >
> > Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
>
> Yes, they are:
>
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
Yes, they are:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packaged/#_no_external_kernel_modules
--
Iñaki Úcar
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 9:03 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
My recollection (from some time ago) was there was
a process to request a (short term) exception to
allow one to ship a kernel module if the kernel
module developer (not the
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:56:08 -0400
Christopher wrote:
> Has anyone tried packaging v4l2loopback into Fedora? I'd really like
> to set up a screen capture device for video conferencing stuff, but I
> keep running into problems with SecureBoot. I don't really know what
> I'm doing with mokutil or
Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi,
Has anyone tried packaging v4l2loopback into Fedora? I'd really like
to set up a screen capture device for video conferencing stuff, but I
keep running into problems with SecureBoot. I don't really know what
I'm doing with mokutil or DKMS and I'm generally uncomfortable
building kernel
19 matches
Mail list logo
