Simone Caronni wrote:
> Ok, sounds fair, thanks for clarification. In that thread on -devel (i've
> read it yesterday) there's the note that it would be eventually introduced
> "somewhere around Fedora 22".
At the time, it wasn't fully decided yet. (Keep in mind that the mail was
written over a y
On 4 June 2015 at 03:24, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> ndeed, you missed:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/196343.html
>
> libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+ system tray
> applets to work under KDE Plasma. (Plasma 5 no longer supports the legacy
>
drago01 wrote:
> The thing is we want to kill it but our designers didn't come up with
> a suitable replacement "just use notifications" does not cover what
> the app authors want so they stick to systray icons unfortunately. But
> we should have this discussion upstream not here.
The Status Notif
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 03:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+
>> system tray
>> applets to work under KDE Plasma. (Plasma 5 no longer supports the >
>> legacy XEmbed-based system tray protocol that the builtin G
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 03:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+
>> system tray
>> applets to work under KDE Plasma. (Plasma 5 no longer supports the > legacy
>> XEmbed-based system
On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 03:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+
> system tray
> applets to work under KDE Plasma. (Plasma 5 no longer supports the > legacy
> XEmbed-based system tray protocol that the builtin GTK+ classes
> implement.)
H
poma wrote:
> On 03.06.2015 14:28, Giovanni Panozzo wrote:
>>
>> Adding Antenore to this thread, the other Remmina developer left on the
>> whole earth :)
>>
>> My small contribution: Remmina can survive without libappindicators. It
>> will fallback to use GtkStatusIcon to show its icon under Xf
poma wrote:
> Oh yeah
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2013-July/msg00203.html
That is from 2013 and the "it is useless" claim is no longer true now that
KDE Plasma also requires the new protocol. (Actually, it was never true,
because system tray applets using the new protocol a
Simone Caronni wrote:
> Was Remmina the only program built against libappindicator (not sure I got
> all cases in the repoquery)?
There is also gnome-rdp (uses it through appindicator-sharp), where upstream
made it a mandatory dependency. And your own queries also bring up uget.
Unfortunately, t
poma wrote:
> Did I really missed something important in this respect, or in a parallel
> universe you guys use Unity on Fedora?
Indeed, you missed:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/196343.html
libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+ system tray
On 3 June 2015 at 14:28, Giovanni Panozzo wrote:
>
> Adding Antenore to this thread, the other Remmina developer left on the
> whole earth :)
>
> My small contribution: Remmina can survive without libappindicators. It
> will fallback to use GtkStatusIcon to show its icon under Xfce/Lxde/Kde
> (no
On 3 June 2015 at 12:09, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > If I remember correctly there was a time when people were discussing
> about
> > bringing Unity in Fedora. This did not happen, and actually the library
> is
> > pretty useless as there is no libappindicator consumer right now. I'm not
> > sure
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On 3 June 2015 at 11:28, Pavel Alexeev < pa...@hubbitus.info > wrote:
>
>
> > If I remember correctly there was a time when people were discussing
> about
> > bringing Unity in Fedora. This did not happen
- Original Message -
> On 3 June 2015 at 11:28, Pavel Alexeev < pa...@hubbitus.info > wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
> Is not it virt-manager problem or libappindicator? Shouldn't it be addressed
> there?
>
>
> If I remember correctly there was a time when people were discussing about
> bringing U
On 3 June 2015 at 11:28, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> Hi,
>Is not it virt-manager problem or libappindicator? Shouldn't it be
> addressed there?
>
>
If I remember correctly there was a time when people were discussing about
bringing Unity in Fedora. This did not happen, and actually the librar
In Fedora 21 it was already disabled.
Disabled it also on f22 and master branches.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/remmina-1.2.0-0.6.git.b3237e8.fc22
Regards,
--Simone
On 1 June 2015 at 11:20, poma wrote:
>
> libappindicator-gtk3 breaks virt-manager's systray functionality,
> precisel
16 matches
Mail list logo
