On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:04 PM Joe Doss wrote:
>
>
>
> On June 25, 2020 4:50:12 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:33 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>>>
>>>
From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
and the new kernels have the module so how does i
On June 25, 2020 4:50:12 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:33 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
and the new kernels have the module so how does it break their VPNs?
If you remove akmod-wireguard it will also remove
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:49 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> That would be a rather serious flaw in the wireguard tools package to
> have a dep on akmod-wireguard when it has been upstream and included
> in the Fedora kernel-modules package for a few months at this point.
>
>
The wire
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:33 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
> > and the new kernels have the module so how does it break their VPNs?
>
> If you remove akmod-wireguard it will also remove the wireguard package which
> will cause the
> From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
> and the new kernels have the module so how does it break their VPNs?
If you remove akmod-wireguard it will also remove the wireguard package which
will cause the VPN to stop functioning.
Wireguard/wireguard-tools is required
> We did attempt to obsolete it in f32
>
> https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages.git/log/?h=f32
>
> TBH I don't really like the idea much, removing peoples VPN isn't cool and
> leaves them exposed.
From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
We did attempt to obsolete it in f32
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages.git/log/?h=f32
TBH I don't really like the idea much, removing peoples VPN isn't cool and
leaves them exposed.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
On 6/24/20 5:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
As rpmfusion isn't an official Fedora repository the kernel wouldn't
obsolete it, how would that work for the 100s of quasi fedora repos
that spring up all over the place?
Maybe rpmfusion should have something akin to fedora-obsolete-package
for componen
> > I noticed that kmod-wireguard is being updated on F31, even after
> > WireGuard became a part of Linux kernel since 5.6.0. Shouldn't
> > kernel>5.6.0 obsolete kmod-wireguard? Is it kept and updated because
> > it was originally installed via @commandline?
> >
> > We had a discussion about not r
On 6/24/20 6:03 PM, Joe Doss wrote:
On 6/24/20 4:28 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
It was akmod-wireguard (thanks Laura, Alexander, Joe, Leigh and Ian).
This leaves the question: Shouldn't kernel>5.6.0 obsolete
kmod-wireguard and akmod-wireguard? and maybe replace wireguard with
wireg
On 6/24/20 4:28 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
It was akmod-wireguard (thanks Laura, Alexander, Joe, Leigh and Ian).
This leaves the question: Shouldn't kernel>5.6.0 obsolete kmod-wireguard
and akmod-wireguard? and maybe replace wireguard with wireguard-tools?
Looking at this RPM's ch
On 6/24/20 4:29 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
I noticed that kmod-wireguard is being updated on F31, even after
WireGuard became a part of Linux kernel since 5.6.0. Shouldn't
kernel>5.6.0 obsolete kmod-wireguard? Is it kept and updated because
it was originally installed via @commandli
> I noticed that kmod-wireguard is being updated on F31, even after WireGuard
> became a part
> of Linux kernel since 5.6.0. Shouldn't kernel>5.6.0 obsolete kmod-wireguard?
> Is it
> kept and updated because it was originally installed via @commandline?
>
> We had a discussion about not removing
On 6/24/20 4:02 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
repo id repo name
code Visual Studio Code (blush)
fedora Fedora 31 - x86_64
fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 31 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64
fedora-modular Fedora Modular 31 - x86_64
rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Free
rpmfusion-fre
There is an akmod-wireguard package in RPMFusion, so you probably installed
it from there are somepoint. You should be able to just uninstall the akmod.
-Ian
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:03 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 6/24/20 4:35 PM, Laura Abbott wr
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:04 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
>
> so the repo it's coming from is @commandline, but I am not doing
> it---somehow akmods pulls it in? my repolist is:
You probably have akmod-wireguard from rpmfusion-free.
___
devel
On 6/24/20 4:35 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 6/24/20 4:29 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
I noticed that kmod-wireguard is being updated on F31, even after
WireGuard became a part of Linux kernel since 5.6.0. Shouldn't
kernel>5.6.0 obsolete kmod-wireguard? Is it kept and updated because
On 6/24/20 4:29 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
I noticed that kmod-wireguard is being updated on F31, even after
WireGuard became a part of Linux kernel since 5.6.0. Shouldn't
kernel>5.6.0 obsolete kmod-wireguard? Is it kept and updated because it
was originally installed via @command
I noticed that kmod-wireguard is being updated on F31, even after WireGuard became
a part of Linux kernel since 5.6.0. Shouldn't kernel>5.6.0 obsolete
kmod-wireguard? Is it kept and updated because it was originally installed via
@commandline?
We had a discussion about not removing any obsolet
19 matches
Mail list logo
