yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
Heya, I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16 virtual machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else. Here is some info: # [root@dhcp201-139 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 16 (Verne)

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote: Heya, I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16 virtual machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else. And no /bin/sh either? It is provided by bash. ERROR with transaction check vs

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote: Heya, I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16 virtual machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else. And no /bin/sh either? It is

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:21:03 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote: On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote: Heya, I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16 virtual machine. Only @core package, so

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Tomi Leppikangas
Kashyap Chamarthy writes: Running Transaction Check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: /bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64 I have this same problem when trying to upgrade from fedora 15 to rawhide. I noticed that groff-base package have 2 /bin/sh as dependency, is there

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Jan Vcelak
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote: Kashyap Chamarthy writes: Running Transaction Check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: /bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64 I have this same problem when trying to upgrade from fedora 15 to rawhide. I

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:22:34 +0300, TL (Tomi) wrote: Kashyap Chamarthy writes: Running Transaction Check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: /bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64 I have this same problem when trying to upgrade from fedora 15 to rawhide. I noticed

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/11/2011 08:16 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote: On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote: Kashyap Chamarthy writes: Running Transaction Check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: /bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64 I have this same problem when trying to

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 10/11/2011 11:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 10/11/2011 08:16 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote: On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote: Kashyap Chamarthy writes: Running Transaction Check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: /bin/sh is needed by

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On 10/11/2011 08:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:21:03 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote: On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote: Heya, I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16

Re: yum update -- F16-latest = rawhide

2011-10-11 Thread Jan Vcelak
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20:02:41, Panu Matilainen wrote: This is a bug in rpm's handling of %pretrans dependencies. I'll try to get it fixed tomorrow, BUT this also does point out a problem in the package: %pretrans scripts can almost never in real life be /bin/sh scripts, because on