The horizontal positioning of the vertical line between line number and
text looks fine, now. I ran several test and the location always looked
reasonable.
A printout of the same page of the same document from V1.22 and the git
version shows that the characters in the new version are printed m
I found a new problem just now. I changed the font size from 10 to 12.
Text that is tab-aligned on the screen, and tab-aligned in Print Preview
when the font size is 10 is no longer tab-aligned in Print Preview when
the font size is 12.
Regards,
Roger
_
Le 01/11/2012 15:41, Roger Booth a écrit :
> On 11/01/2012 06:13 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
>>
>> Well well… I have less and less ideas, but what if you comment out lines
>> 312-323 (after patching)? I copied this logic from SciTE, but I'm not
>> sure it's correct, maybe this should not be inclu
On 11/01/2012 06:13 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Well well… I have less and less ideas, but what if you comment out lines
312-323 (after patching)? I copied this logic from SciTE, but I'm not
sure it's correct, maybe this should not be included and is only useful
when dealing directly with the
Anyway, the good news is that my test doc, page one anyway, does not wrap.
Yeah, at least the font sizing is better.
Hey, that was the major gripe I had with the new implementation. I can
easily just comment out the lines in printer.c that draw the vertical
line, and I'll be happy. So I app
Le 01/11/2012 04:10, Roger Booth a écrit :
> I applied the patch. Page 1 of the printout has 54 lines, Print Preview
> has 56.
>
> The vertical line on Print Preview looks fine, on the hard copy it
> appears on top of the least significant digit of the line number. For
> example, on line 1, the ve
