On 13-09-04 09:20 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 01/09/2013 02:36, Matthew Brush wrote:
I would even go so far as to say it's silly to not use C++11 since it's
[...]
Just for fun I wrote some theoretical code that could be used in a
program like Geany to compare styles between various C's and
On 05/09/2013 09:41, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-09-04 09:20 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
My C89 C++ version:
guint i;
foreach_document(i) {
GeanyDocument *doc = documents[i];
// do stuff with every valid doc
}
While this code is short, it's actually sort of nuts too (and also not
On 01/09/2013 02:36, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-08-29 05:08 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 29/08/2013 02:39, Matthew Brush wrote:
[...]
If we were to use C++, I think it'd be pointless to limit it to
CFront/CwithClasses-style 1980's C++. We should use common/standard
stuff like standard
On 13-09-05 02:26 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 01/09/2013 02:36, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-08-29 05:08 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 29/08/2013 02:39, Matthew Brush wrote:
[...]
If we were to use C++, I think it'd be pointless to limit it to
CFront/CwithClasses-style 1980's C++. We should
[...]
Hi Nick,
Still somewhat noisy IMO. How about this, C++98 (I think):
#include boost/foreach.hpp
#define FOREACH BOOST_FOREACH
FOREACH(Document doc, win.documents())
{
// do stuff with each document
}
Frankly if you want to limit the parts of standard C++ that are used, the
