I kinda feel bad for the Windows users (in more than one way ;-), but I sure
would like to see those inline file modified dialogs instead of pop-ups.
Also, removing the if defs like Tory suggests and simplifying code is always
nice.
Is there any way to give some support to the Windows guys
On 13-10-02 10:25 PM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
[...]
Do we know how many people on Windows use Geany, users specifically and not
geany devs?
It's impossible to know[1] but if I had to guess[2], I'd say at least
25% of users are on Windows. In addition, I believe several of the core
Le 03/10/2013 02:19, Lex Trotman a écrit :
All Developers,
Its time we deprecated windows support!!
Although I don't use Windows, I don't really see why.
The windows code in Geany is:
- unmaintained and bit-rotting
Nick uses it AFAIK, and he had done things on it, so it's not that
On 3 October 2013 23:19, Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.orgwrote:
Le 03/10/2013 02:19, Lex Trotman a écrit :
All Developers,
Its time we deprecated windows support!!
Although I don't use Windows, I don't really see why.
The windows code in Geany is:
- unmaintained and
On 13-10-03 05:31 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
Moving to devel list.
On 02/10/2013 22:58, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-10-02 04:40 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 01/10/2013 22:28, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-10-01 05:34 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
Just checked my email, was away last week. I'll have
I kinda like what Lex said:
I'm not saying delete anything inside #ifdef OS_WIN32 tomorrow. But
also in fairness some warning that platform specific code is not being
maintained adequately needs to be given to Windows users, and their help
sought, and this is one way I can think of that
On 13-10-03 07:37 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 3 October 2013 23:19, Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.orgwrote:
[...]
Anyway, although I agree the Windows version isn't as good as it should
right now, I don't really see the problem it causes to the rest of
Geany. And if we indeed
On 03/10/2013 15:37, Lex Trotman wrote:
- holding us at an unreasonably old GTK version
Sorry? I don't think Windows support has anything to do with the GTK
version we support. If anything, it's rather the contrary, providing a
newer version for Windows installers is far easier than forcing
cc'ing the devel list.
Hi Matt,
I'll have to reply to this email properly tomorrow.
In the meantime, there are 3 spawning variants: I'm confident that the
custom process spawning code is definitely seriously buggy. I really do
need the system() code. I tried, but couldn't fix it. I know that
