On 13-11-14 10:56 AM, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:47:26 -0800
Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-11-12 10:43 AM, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 01:31:35 -0800
Matthew Brush wrote:
1. An architecture that allows multi-threading to be used for non-GUI
tasks.
Another (pe
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:59:47 +0100
Harold Aling wrote:
> How many "Geany on Windows" users are there? is it 90% POSIX/10%
> Windows? Or more? Less?
>
> I'm a big fan of the "90% rule". If 90% of the users don't need/want
> it, don't implement or support it. Same goes for library versions: if
> 9
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:47:26 -0800
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 13-11-12 10:43 AM, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 01:31:35 -0800
> > Matthew Brush wrote:
> >
> >>> 1. An architecture that allows multi-threading to be used for non-GUI
> >>> tasks.
> >>
> >> Another (perhaps more obvio
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:27:20 -0800
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Unless we're going to switch toolkits or someone is volunteering to
> maintain a fork, there's really no logical reason to avoid the
> inevitable, [switch to GTK+3]
I've heard this a lot when Vista came out. And it never got > 18%
marke
On 14 November 2013 13:51, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Am 14.11.2013 01:18, schrieb Matthew Brush:
>
>> It's a great idea but as you mentioned on IRC, we really have no way to
>> know how representative subscribers to the users list are. For example
>> maybe only X out of every X^Y Geany users subscribe
Am 14.11.2013 01:18, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> It's a great idea but as you mentioned on IRC, we really have no way to
> know how representative subscribers to the users list are. For example
> maybe only X out of every X^Y Geany users subscribes to the mailing
> list, so even if we ask and N peopl
