On 7 June 2014 10:32, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 14-06-06 07:17 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> based up on Matthew's fine GtkActions branch [1] I think we could
>> realistically rewrite keybindings.c use GtkAction/accelerators properly.
>>
>> Currently it re-implements lots of gtk stu
On 14-06-06 07:17 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Hello,
based up on Matthew's fine GtkActions branch [1] I think we could
realistically rewrite keybindings.c use GtkAction/accelerators properly.
Currently it re-implements lots of gtk stuff, such as the actual looping
through the known keybindings fo
On 14-06-06 01:35 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 06.06.2014 16:24, schrieb Yosef Or Boczko:
I think it better to port to GAction instead of GtkAction (GtkAction
has been deprecated since version 3.10 and will be removed in GTK+ 4),
so it will be ease to port geany to GTK+ 4 in the future.
We hav
Am 06.06.2014 16:24, schrieb Yosef Or Boczko:
I think it better to port to GAction instead of GtkAction (GtkAction
has been deprecated since version 3.10 and will be removed in GTK+ 4),
so it will be ease to port geany to GTK+ 4 in the future.
We have elaborated GAction. The problem is that it
I think it better to port to GAction instead of GtkAction (GtkAction
has been deprecated since version 3.10 and will be removed in GTK+ 4),
so it will be ease to port geany to GTK+ 4 in the future.
Also, IIRC, there is a problem with GtkAction, wich cause to some
accelactors
to work only when t
Hello,
based up on Matthew's fine GtkActions branch [1] I think we could
realistically rewrite keybindings.c use GtkAction/accelerators properly.
Currently it re-implements lots of gtk stuff, such as the actual looping
through the known keybindings for the callback when a keybinding
pressed.