Re: [Geany-Devel] Scintilla Use

2018-03-21 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2018-03-21 09:04 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: I would think by the time older LTS distros are up to C++17, that Scintillua/LongTerm3 will have no reason to exist anymore. Old LTS will never get it, thats why they are called "stable", what I meant is the next LTS, for example Ubuntu is scheduled to

Re: [Geany-Devel] Scintilla Use

2018-03-21 Thread Lex Trotman
> I would think by the time older LTS distros are up to C++17, that > Scintillua/LongTerm3 will have no reason to exist anymore. Old LTS will never get it, thats why they are called "stable", what I meant is the next LTS, for example Ubuntu is scheduled to release a new LTS next month which will h

Re: [Geany-Devel] Scintilla Use

2018-03-21 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2018-03-21 08:01 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: On 22 March 2018 at 10:35, Matthew Brush wrote: Hi, Going forward, are we going to use the Scintilla LongTerm3 branch or v4.x releases? Interesting question. I had been assuming that once Neil settled it down and after the next round of LTS Linuxen

Re: [Geany-Devel] Scintilla Use

2018-03-21 Thread Lex Trotman
On 22 March 2018 at 10:35, Matthew Brush wrote: > Hi, > > Going forward, are we going to use the Scintilla LongTerm3 branch or v4.x > releases? Interesting question. I had been assuming that once Neil settled it down and after the next round of LTS Linuxen were released with C++17 (at least in t

[Geany-Devel] Scintilla Use

2018-03-21 Thread Matthew Brush
Hi, Going forward, are we going to use the Scintilla LongTerm3 branch or v4.x releases? If LongTerm3, is there any opposition to integrating the new LPeg lexer so we can use/write lexers in Lua/PEG? I might be interested in working on this if it's not going to be controversial. Regards, Ma

Re: [Geany-Devel] Why has the universal ctags project to be merged?

2018-03-21 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 21/03/2018 à 17:17, Lars Paulsen a écrit : > Hello, > > I have got a maybe stupid question out of curiosity: > Why needs the universal ctags project be merged into Geany instead of > e.g. just copying it over? Lex covered it more thoroughly I guess, but it basically simply boils down to having

Re: [Geany-Devel] Why has the universal ctags project to be merged?

2018-03-21 Thread Lex Trotman
On 22 March 2018 at 07:17, Lars Paulsen wrote: > Hello, > > I have got a maybe stupid question out of curiosity: > Why needs the universal ctags project be merged into Geany instead of e.g. > just copying it over? > I guess the reason is not that we do not trust their test quality ;-) Its not rea

[Geany-Devel] Why has the universal ctags project to be merged?

2018-03-21 Thread Lars Paulsen
Hello, I have got a maybe stupid question out of curiosity: Why needs the universal ctags project be merged into Geany instead of e.g. just copying it over? I guess the reason is not that we do not trust their test quality ;-) Greetings, Lars ___ De