On 27.11.2015 18:57, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
>
> It'll be nice if somebody makes the vte and headers checks in
> scope.m4 as unix-only (there's already a "case" for the non-unix
> platforms). Personally I'll dump a TODO list for the plugin, and
> mark it as "Orphaned", along with geanyinsertnum and
On 28.11.2015 02:56, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 2015-11-27 9:57 AM, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Enough. If the gtk+3 developers want to target the mobile market
>> or something, so be it. [...]
>>
>
> I feel your frustration. The overall Windows support by GTK+ has
> severely degraded with
On 2015-11-27 9:57 AM, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
[...]
Enough. If the gtk+3 developers want to target the mobile market
or something, so be it. [...]
I feel your frustration. The overall Windows support by GTK+ has
severely degraded with GTK+ 3 in a number of ways:
- Uses touch-style GNOME t
Hi,
Le 27/11/2015 18:57, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
> I see that the Scope plugin is marked in autotools as gtk+2 only,
> and rightly so. […]
>
> Enough. If the gtk+3 developers want to target the mobile market
> or something, so be it. I'm switching to another editor. It has
> disadvantages, but i
Hi, All,
I see that the Scope plugin is marked in autotools as gtk+2 only,
and rightly so. At some point, gtk+3 broke GtkTextView: instead
of a reasonable default size, a view without text is 0 pixels
high (actually 1, gtk+ does not support zero). One of these views
is critical for the Scope UI.
