Wow, you found the article :-)
From what I've seen of geany, the code looks much better than some code
I've seen. It didn't take as long to familiarize myself with the basic
structure since the code files are well named and the directory
structure is far from deep ;-) One of the reasons I
On 13-11-13 08:21 AM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
Wow, you found the article :-)
From what I've seen of geany, the code looks much better than some code
I've seen. It didn't take as long to familiarize myself with the basic
structure since the code files are well named and the directory
structure
On 13-11-11 11:48 PM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
That sounds pretty good. Is that a lot like python and gtk? I get the
impression its better since I don't think python compiles to equivolent c code?
If by better you mean faster, leaner, and more compatible with
existing C code, yep. It
I'm thinking vala sounds like a good idea the more I hear about it... :-)
On 11/12/2013 02:36 AM, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-11-11 11:48 PM, Steven Blatnick wrote:
That sounds pretty good. Is that a lot like python and gtk? I get
the impression its better since I don't think python compiles
I cannot add much to the vala yes/no question, as the only part of ala
I've seen by know are Matthews's plugin in g-p. Two or maybe three
things are important to me, in case of:
- Geany needs to keep its small memory footprint
- Created code needs to run on all plattforms Geany currently is
On 13-11-12 07:50 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
I cannot add much to the vala yes/no question, as the only part of ala
I've seen by know are Matthews's plugin in g-p. Two or maybe three
things are important to me, in case of:
- Geany needs to keep its small memory footprint
Yes, I don't think
I hope I don't have to rewrite my plugins again for this editor ;-) I
will admit though, seg faulting all of geany in a plugin gets annoying :-)
Maybe I'm spoiling the party, but like with gnome 2, sometimes sticking
with what you have is better than seemingly needless upgrades. I'm
running
On 13-11-11 05:37 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 10.11.2013 21:04, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Maybe it's something specific to that Gist, so I re-pasted it in a new
one:
https://gist.github.com/codebrainz/7403171
Impressive. Unfortunately only a tiny fraction of Geany's code can be
vala'fied
Disclaimer: I know little to nothing about Vala.
I like how lean Geany is. From the discussion, it sounds like Vala does
its own memory management. Currently geany only uses between 9 and 13
MB of memory on my box. Would Vala inadvertantly make geany use more
memory? I don't want to use
On 12 November 2013 03:38, Steven Blatnick steve8tr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Disclaimer: I know little to nothing about Vala.
I like how lean Geany is. From the discussion, it sounds like Vala does
its own memory management. Currently geany only uses between 9 and 13 MB
of memory on my box.
Am 12.11.2013 05:52, schrieb Steven Blatnick:
By the way, I should point out that these remarks also apply to the
geany direction thread. I also should point out this doesn't
necessarily mean I'm opposed to vala, I'm just expressing concerns.
From this thread, it sounds like vala binds
[...]
Not what it says here https://wiki.gnome.org/Vala/Manual/Errors and
anything that can throw through C code can cause leaks since the C code
doesn't clean up. Same as C++, you can't use exceptions mixed with C
code.
Trust me, I generated lots of C code from Vala, when you throw an
Maybe, rewriting some parts of boating complicated leaky code (e.g. build.c:)
isn't bad idea and suitable in this situation. You don't need much bindings for
editor and Vala shouldn't be a pain. But AFAIK Geany don't use GObject and
writing on Vala may cause deep refactoring that will take your
Am 10.11.2013 05:44, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Hi all,
In the spirit of the previous discussions about using C99 and C++ in
Geany code with similar subject lines, I'd like to take a
poll/discussion for allowing the use of Vala for new/re-written Geany
code. The pros and cons likely will be
On 13-11-10 02:00 AM, Pavel Roschin wrote:
Maybe, rewriting some parts of boating complicated leaky code (e.g. build.c:)
isn't bad idea and suitable in this situation. You don't need much bindings for
editor and Vala shouldn't be a pain. But AFAIK Geany don't use GObject and
writing on Vala may
On 13-11-10 07:40 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 10/11/2013 05:44, Matthew Brush a écrit :
Hi all,
In the spirit of the previous discussions about using C99 and C++ in
Geany code with similar subject lines, I'd like to take a
poll/discussion for allowing the use of Vala for new/re-written
Am 10.11.2013 20:27, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 13-11-10 07:40 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 10/11/2013 05:44, Matthew Brush a écrit :
Hi all,
In the spirit of the previous discussions about using C99 and C++ in
Geany code with similar subject lines, I'd like to take a
poll/discussion for
On 13-11-10 11:45 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 10.11.2013 20:27, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 13-11-10 07:40 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 10/11/2013 05:44, Matthew Brush a écrit :
Hi all,
In the spirit of the previous discussions about using C99 and C++ in
Geany code with similar subject
On 13-11-10 01:44 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
Not what it says here https://wiki.gnome.org/Vala/Manual/Errors and
anything that can throw through C code can cause leaks since the C code
doesn't clean up. Same as C++, you can't use exceptions mixed with C
code.
Trust me, I generated lots
On 11 November 2013 02:40, Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.orgwrote:
Le 10/11/2013 05:44, Matthew Brush a écrit :
Hi all,
In the spirit of the previous discussions about using C99 and C++ in
Geany code with similar subject lines, I'd like to take a
poll/discussion for allowing
[...]
Yes, I understand how the throws are implemented in vala, but as I said,
the existing C code isn't designed to handle that.
Much of the existing code uses GError-style errors, and any existing C
code that was made to to call Vala generated code would do the same, no
biggie. It's not
On 13-11-10 03:02 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
Yes, I understand how the throws are implemented in vala, but as I said,
the existing C code isn't designed to handle that.
Much of the existing code uses GError-style errors, and any existing C
code that was made to to call Vala generated
On 10 November 2013 15:44, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi all,
In the spirit of the previous discussions about using C99 and C++ in Geany
code with similar subject lines, I'd like to take a poll/discussion for
allowing the use of Vala for new/re-written Geany code. The pros and
23 matches
Mail list logo
