On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:26:15 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> > - no plugin search feature
>
> That don't seem required to be, but could indeed be handy with the
> growing number of plugins. Should be fairly easy to add, minus good
> matching.
Hmmm... thinking about the matching part. Full tex
Le 24/04/2014 07:07, Thomas Martitz a écrit :
> Am 24.04.2014 03:26, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
>> Again, I don't particularly like the "all embedded, fat dialog" design,
>> and again, most of the plugins simply want to display a web page. And
>> no, we won't depend on a web rendering engine for t
Am 30.04.2014 15:42, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
Le 24/04/2014 06:05, Pavel Roschin a écrit :
PS: sorry for perhaps sounding harsh, but I had to answer quickly now
Lex almost made you lose some of your time implementing before talking :)
Think then do :) This is because I made concept before imp
Le 24/04/2014 06:05, Pavel Roschin a écrit :
>> PS: sorry for perhaps sounding harsh, but I had to answer quickly now
>> Lex almost made you lose some of your time implementing before talking :)
>
> Think then do :) This is because I made concept before implementing/PR.
>
> The most annoying thin
Am 24.04.2014 03:26, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
Again, I don't particularly like the "all embedded, fat dialog" design,
and again, most of the plugins simply want to display a web page. And
no, we won't depend on a web rendering engine for this, sorry.
Any suggestions?
Do something simple, no
On 24 April 2014 14:05, Pavel Roschin wrote:
>> PS: sorry for perhaps sounding harsh, but I had to answer quickly now
>> Lex almost made you lose some of your time implementing before talking :)
>
> Think then do :) This is because I made concept before implementing/PR.
>
> The most annoying thing
> PS: sorry for perhaps sounding harsh, but I had to answer quickly now
> Lex almost made you lose some of your time implementing before talking :)
Think then do :) This is because I made concept before implementing/PR.
The most annoying thing is long, hard to read plugin description (if you
reme
Le 23/04/2014 20:58, Pavel Roschin a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> There are some inconveniences in current plugin manager window:
> - plugin description is too long and is hard to read because of window width
Indeed. It used to be presented otherwise, not sure why it ended up
like this, but it's clearly
On 24 April 2014 04:58, Pavel Roschin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> There are some inconveniences in current plugin manager window:
> - plugin description is too long and is hard to read because of window width
> - too many actions user need to perform to get access to plugin settings
> - no plugin search f
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Pavel Roschin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> There are some inconveniences in current plugin manager window:
> - plugin description is too long and is hard to read because of window
> width
> - too many actions user need to perform to get access to plugin settings
> - no plug
Hi,
On Wed 23 Apr 2014 20:58:07 CEST,
Pavel Roschin wrote:
Hello!
There are some inconveniences in current plugin manager window:
- plugin description is too long and is hard to read because of window width
- too many actions user need to perform to get access to plugin settings
- no plugin se
Hello!
There are some inconveniences in current plugin manager window:
- plugin description is too long and is hard to read because of window width
- too many actions user need to perform to get access to plugin settings
- no plugin search feature
- too many windows: settings - window, keybindings
12 matches
Mail list logo
