On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 07:06:43 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Sigh, this is one of the places where a system interface should be
const char* but isn't.
Quick and dirty patch attached.
Thanks. Will apply it.
Cheers,
Frank
pgpLliyGvLKD5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:07:04 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
geanysendmail - 3 const discarded warnings
I have these on my plate, but no idea whether this is really a problem
(I don't think so) nor how I can fix it.
Cheers,
Frank
pgpgklCxEhcqi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Le 21/02/2014 03:16, Lex Trotman a écrit :
[...]
Well, the same as for code written by humans, the C compiler warning
is telling us something *might* be wrong with the code. The Vala
compiler may have bugs, so such things need checking the same as
manual code, to avoid possible UB. If, as
Le 21/02/2014 15:02, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:07:04 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
geanysendmail - 3 const discarded warnings
I have these on my plate, but no idea whether this is really a problem
(I don't think so)
It's not a real problem, it's only a
On 14-02-21 06:30 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 21/02/2014 03:16, Lex Trotman a écrit :
[...]
Well, the same as for code written by humans, the C compiler warning
is telling us something *might* be wrong with the code. The Vala
compiler may have bugs, so such things need checking the same
Le 21/02/2014 16:39, Matthew Brush a écrit :
On 14-02-21 06:30 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 21/02/2014 03:16, Lex Trotman a écrit :
[...]
OK, I didn't think it was OK to assume GCC was the compiler,
It isn't, indeed. Although well, to be fair we probably have no idea
what happens if
On 22 February 2014 04:50, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:52:51 +0100
Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
[...]
OK, I didn't think it was OK to assume GCC was the compiler,
It isn't, indeed. Although well, to be fair we probably
On 14-02-21 11:54 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 22 February 2014 04:50, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:52:51 +0100
Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
[...]
OK, I didn't think it was OK to assume GCC was the compiler,
It isn't, indeed.
Le 20/02/2014 09:07, Lex Trotman a écrit :
[...]
geanygendoc - 2 warnings, extra switch case may be consequential,
unused function
[...]
Unused functions and variables are probably inconsequential, unless
they are the result of a typo in the code meant to use them, they need
a quick check
On 14-02-20 12:07 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
Hi All,
On the off chance that we might be converging on a release I did a
compile of the plugins with the usual options (-Wall -Wextra
-Wno-unused-paratemers).
This was on GTK2 since many still don't work for GTK3.
The results are not too bad really
On 21 February 2014 02:02, Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 20/02/2014 09:07, Lex Trotman a écrit :
[...]
geanygendoc - 2 warnings, extra switch case may be consequential,
unused function
[...]
Unused functions and variables are probably inconsequential, unless
they
[...]
Well, the same as for code written by humans, the C compiler warning
is telling us something *might* be wrong with the code. The Vala
compiler may have bugs, so such things need checking the same as
manual code, to avoid possible UB. If, as in these cases, it seems to
be ok, then its just
12 matches
Mail list logo
