Am 24.10.2013 05:59, schrieb Matthew Brush:Don't try to make special
conditions that say your contributions must not
be discussed/reviewed, thats rude, its like saying you think you are
better
than the other contributors on this list.
I said it specifically to avoid getting into deep design
On 13-10-24 12:23 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 24.10.2013 04:09, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 13-10-23 11:36 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
[snip]
Regarding that pattern we discussed previously and used in this
AutoClose code for attaching data to a document, I'd be interested
whether you or anyone
Am 24.10.2013 16:25, schrieb Matthew Brush:
I agree with that.
I also agree with your general idea of per-document data lists. However,
I'm not seeing the point of the new code you added because each doc has
already a ScintillaObject, which is a GObject. I would suggest that the
On 13-10-23 05:29 AM, n@sk0 wrote:
Before read : Keep in mind that i am *not* C/C++ native developer, and
all message below can be just rant.
After little testing and debugging, i found that :
In on_editor_notify() function, user_data is not a valid pointer :
on_editor_notify(GObject *obj, gint
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:53:16 -0700
Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
The final problem is that, as Lex mentioned, it's not checking
`DOC_VALID()` (or doc-is_valid) but just that data-doc != NULL, so
if any document that was ever activated is closed, this is going to
explode when the
(for reasons I never
understood, Geany recycles documents, so it's entirely possible to
have a document pointer that is neither NULL nor valid)
Didn't expect that. I'll fix my plugins for such kind of mistakes.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Roschin aka RPG
Am 23.10.2013 16:53, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 13-10-23 05:29 AM, n@sk0 wrote:
Before read : Keep in mind that i am *not* C/C++ native developer, and
all message below can be just rant.
After little testing and debugging, i found that :
In on_editor_notify() function, user_data is not a valid
On 24 October 2013 13:09, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 13-10-23 11:36 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
[snip]
Regarding that pattern we discussed previously and used in this AutoClose
code for attaching data to a document, I'd be interested whether you or
anyone thinks this
[...]
I said it specifically to avoid getting into deep design discussions or
code reviews, I just want a general +1 or -1 whether anyone thinks the
general concept is useful and whether it's worth looking at implementing
something similar. If not one else really cares, it's not worth getting
On 13-10-23 09:13 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
I said it specifically to avoid getting into deep design discussions or
code reviews, I just want a general +1 or -1 whether anyone thinks the
general concept is useful and whether it's worth looking at implementing
something similar. If not one
On 13-10-23 08:39 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 24 October 2013 13:09, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 13-10-23 11:36 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
[snip]
Regarding that pattern we discussed previously and used in this AutoClose
code for attaching data to a document, I'd be
[...]
But it seems a pity to have to duplicate the glib interface for each
structure that offers the facility, can we just return the GData and let
the plugins use the normal g_datalist functions?
[...]
To summarise the answer to the question Matthew gave on IRC, no, we don't
have to
12 matches
Mail list logo
