Le 08/08/2014 17:55, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> [...]
>
> Maybe we could update the toolchain used there if anyone knows a working
> toolchain and has enough will to do it. I personally don't want to do
> this as long as the code compiles against gcc 3.4 because it is always a
> pain (for me).
OK,
On 08/08/14 01:23, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 8 August 2014 02:24, Enrico Tröger wrote:
>> On 01/08/14 13:23, Lex Trotman wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Update: it isn't either ;-) So I suppose I'll just add the includes
>>> manually. I thought maybe there was some magic happening somewhere.
>>
>>>
Heyho,
On 08/08/14 01:19, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 14-08-07 02:58 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
>> Le 07/08/2014 23:38, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
>>> On 07/08/14 18:41, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 07/08/2014 18:24, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> [...] I'd like to make the nightly
> builds a
On 8 August 2014 02:24, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On 01/08/14 13:23, Lex Trotman wrote:
>> [...]
>> Update: it isn't either ;-) So I suppose I'll just add the includes
>> manually. I thought maybe there was some magic happening somewhere.
>
>
> Maybe magic somewhere, the windows n
On 14-08-07 02:58 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 07/08/2014 23:38, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On 07/08/14 18:41, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 07/08/2014 18:24, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
[...] I'd like to make the nightly
builds a bit stricter especially if it helps to spoil out such problems.
Any
Le 07/08/2014 23:38, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> On 07/08/14 18:41, Colomban Wendling wrote:
>> Le 07/08/2014 18:24, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
>>> [...] I'd like to make the nightly
>>> builds a bit stricter especially if it helps to spoil out such problems.
>>>
>>> Any idea how to make such warnings e
On 07/08/14 18:41, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 07/08/2014 18:24, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
>> [...] I'd like to make the nightly
>> builds a bit stricter especially if it helps to spoil out such problems.
>>
>> Any idea how to make such warnings error without using -Werror? I'm
>> afraid -Werror is
Le 07/08/2014 18:24, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> [...] I'd like to make the nightly
> builds a bit stricter especially if it helps to spoil out such problems.
>
> Any idea how to make such warnings error without using -Werror? I'm
> afraid -Werror is too hard for cross-compiling.
-Werror-implicit-f
On 01/08/14 13:23, Lex Trotman wrote:
> [...]
> Update: it isn't either ;-) So I suppose I'll just add the includes
> manually. I thought maybe there was some magic happening somewhere.
Maybe magic somewhere, the windows nightlys are passing :)
>
> I appears that the "magic"
On 14-08-01 09:34 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 01/08/2014 12:23, Lex Trotman wrote:
Maybe magic somewhere, the windows nightlys are passing:)
I appears that the "magic" is that the compile options are not strict
enough, there are lots of implicit prototype warnings, but they are
not errors.
O
On 01/08/2014 12:23, Lex Trotman wrote:
Maybe magic somewhere, the windows nightlys are passing:)
I appears that the "magic" is that the compile options are not strict
enough, there are lots of implicit prototype warnings, but they are
not errors.
OK then.
_
On 01/08/2014 13:38, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 01/08/2014 13:03, Nick Treleaven a écrit :
On 01/08/2014 11:48, Nick Treleaven wrote:
I'll just add the includes manually
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/308
Looks good to me, I merged it :)
Thanks.
Le 01/08/2014 13:03, Nick Treleaven a écrit :
> On 01/08/2014 11:48, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>> I'll just add the includes manually
>
> https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/308
Looks good to me, I merged it :)
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
h
[...]
Update: it isn't either ;-) So I suppose I'll just add the includes
manually. I thought maybe there was some magic happening somewhere.
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe magic somewhere, the windows nightlys are passing :)
I appears that the "magic" is that the compile options are not strict
enoug
On 1 August 2014 21:18, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 12:13, Lex Trotman wrote:
>>
>> On 1 August 2014 20:48, Nick Treleaven
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/08/2014 11:43, Nick Treleaven wrote:
I can't work out how other files like dialogs.c include win32.h
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Update:
On 01/08/2014 12:13, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 1 August 2014 20:48, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 01/08/2014 11:43, Nick Treleaven wrote:
I can't work out how other files like dialogs.c include win32.h
Update: it isn't either ;-) So I suppose I'll just add the includes
manually. I thought maybe the
On 1 August 2014 20:48, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 11:43, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>>
>> I can't work out how other files like dialogs.c include win32.h
>
>
> Update: it isn't either ;-) So I suppose I'll just add the includes
> manually. I thought maybe there was some magic happening some
On 01/08/2014 11:48, Nick Treleaven wrote:
I'll just add the includes manually
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/308
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/08/2014 11:43, Nick Treleaven wrote:
I can't work out how other files like dialogs.c include win32.h
Update: it isn't either ;-) So I suppose I'll just add the includes
manually. I thought maybe there was some magic happening somewhere.
___
De
Hi,
I haven't built Geany for some time. I remember there was some
refactoring of headers, and now build.c errors because
win32_expand_environment_variables is not declared. Adding the win32.h
include fixes it, but I can't work out how other files like dialogs.c
include win32.h, it doesn't see
20 matches
Mail list logo
