On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:40:43PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 09:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 04:05 -0400, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > This interrupt scheduled for 233-40ms is what sounds wrong. It should
> > > > just continue to blaze of
Hello,
am searching for a cheap mag lens to improve the resolution of the headtracker.
http://www.olpcaustria.org/mediawiki/index.php/Headtracker
What I have found is a very cheap macro lens. I took it from a one-way-camera
and put it directly in front of the web cam lens. The difference is obvi
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 09:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 04:05 -0400, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > This interrupt scheduled for 233-40ms is what sounds wrong. It should
> > > just continue to blaze off the EHCI resume path.
> >
> > ... after 20ms have passed, not almost 20
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 04:05 -0400, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > This interrupt scheduled for 233-40ms is what sounds wrong. It should
> > just continue to blaze off the EHCI resume path.
>
> ... after 20ms have passed, not almost 200.
Ah, right. Sorry, I missed the order of magnitude discrepancy.
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:03:12PM -0400, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 12:50:03PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 04:10 -0400, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > Note: ohci_pci_resume does msleep 20.
> >
> > Hm. It's just waiting for the hardware to settle, r
