I have written an activity that is working ok in sugar-jhbuild but under
QEMU I have problems with file permissions: as the activity is launched
in isolation, I have to give full 777 permissions to the folder where I
store the data, but I have to do it manually from the command line [I
tried adding
On 29.03.2008, at 13:14, Urko Fernandez wrote:
> I have written an activity that is working ok in sugar-jhbuild but
> under
> QEMU I have problems with file permissions: as the activity is
> launched
> in isolation, I have to give full 777 permissions to the folder
> where I
> store the data,
Does anybody have strong feelings about encouraging/discouraging
disassembly?
I was downloading the Disassembly page on the wiki to my XO in case I
needed the instructions while disconnected (default library addendum
idea?) and I noticed there were two very prominent (right under the
title), somew
I don't feel that disassembly should be strongly encouraged or
discouraged, and therefore do not agree with either Bernie or
Adrianne. Although they both provide good points.
Not every kid (or big kid) that has an XO will have an interest in
disassembling it. Every school, however, will have a few
For what it is worth, we are putting it in the default library for the
Peru builds...
-walter
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Isaac Sutcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't feel that disassembly should be strongly encouraged or
> discouraged, and therefore do not agree with either Bernie
1. Peru: Carla Monroy Gomez is in Lima, helping with the final
preparations for the second round of teacher preparation in Peru. This
coming week, 600 teachers in four regional centers will use the XO
Laptop to explore, express, and collaborate. The next phase of the
preparation will be in 18 regio
Using activity.get_activity_root() did the trick, I've bundled the
activity and uploaded to the wiki:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Assimilate
I've filled the application to host the project on the olpc git server a
few days ago but didn't receive any response, shall I write another
application or ju
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We will have an open discussion of how to build a framework that will ease
> the
> creation of reliable collaborative activities. I will also outline a
> proposal
> for "Collisionless", a particular message-bas
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Urko Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've filled the application to host the project on the olpc git server a
> few days ago but didn't receive any response, shall I write another
> application or just wait? Cheers.
I think it usually takes a few days for
That's what I thought, but I first filled the application and then
created the wiki page and uploaded the activity bundled. In case it
helps, the page in the wiki is this:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Assimilate
Urko
>
> I think it usually takes a few days for them to be processed...
>
> Marco
__
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
| On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> We will have an open discussion of how to build a framework that will
ease the
|> creation of reliable collaborative activities. I will also outline a
proposal
|> for "Collisionless",
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a very interesting perspective. I will definitely think hard
> about that and try to come up with a sensible comparison.
>
> Offhand, I think the Collisionless idea is like a design where each
> person's
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> | On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |> We will have an open discussion of how to build a framework that will
> ease the
> |> creation
This is supposed to be an open project. I say that should include
hardware information.
Its one of the things that distinguishes it from such cynical attempts
to enter this market
as the things intel pulled...
JK
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For wh
Part of the allure of constructivism is that it supposedly reduces the role
of the teacher and the bureaucrat, allowing a country where teaching jobs
have been political handouts to the incompetent, to improve its education
system "from the bottom up". There are many good arguments for
constructivi
15 matches
Mail list logo
