Hi,
Fedora and OLPC developers can now download the speech-dispatcher RPM
packages for testing/development of speech enabled activities.
RPMs - OLPC Branch
speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-13.olpc2.i386.rpm -
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/speech-dispatcher/0.6.6/13.olpc2/i386/speech-dispatcher-0.
Thanks. I did a copy-nand and the system is up again, but it still doesn't
explain why the system wouldn't boot. Is there any way of debugging that?
I'll use the save-nand as a backup mechanism once I have got all the
activities installed. This sounds like a good way of creating images and
distri
Ok, so I have a theory which I *hope* explains the whole thing.
In Fedora 7 xinit had ConsoleKit support implemented as a patch:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/xorg-x11-xinit/F-7/xinit-1.0.2-2-poke-ck.patch?rev=1.1&view=log
This worked fine for us.
In Fedora 9, ConsoleKit support is
Hello everyone,
I just finished committing and pushing in a large number of newly
added PO files for a number of activities translated via Pootle.
Please pull to get the latest files, and if something breaks
(hopefully it shouldn't, let me know). Also, you might need to update
your MANIFEST files t
Same on latest Update.1 image
I have no way to test olpc-3 tonight but I assume XDG_SESSION_COOKIE
is not set there, since that's where all of this started :)
Marco
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my stock Fedora 9, XDG_SESSION_COOKIE is set
Hi Sayamindu
As commented before to, I am very satisfied with you qucik reaction.
If I can be of any assistance in the future for you guys, just let me know.
Kind regards and thank you for contributing too!
Urso
2008/6/23, Zarro Boogs per Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> #7296: Language=Papiamen
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 10:36 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:29 PM, David Farning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Two releases per year make sense. Particularly when add in the fact that
> > we have two hemispheres with opposing springs and falls.
>
> Only if you assume w
Hello all,
it is my impression that we are getting a bit confused here
about the various ways and their details, so I'll try to sum
up what I know.
The SSIP protocol client-server TCP protocol is partly
asynchronous. There is a request-reply scheme, but certain
data called 'events' can be delive
>> When the handshaking is taking place the gtk mainloop has not yet started
>> and hence we cannot rely on the event generated by gobject to read data off
>> the socket. And if this handshaking does not take place the API
>> implementation blocks the entire process thus leading to a deadlock. Now
On my stock Fedora 9, XDG_SESSION_COOKIE is set correctly when running startx...
Marco
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like xinit in Fedora is supposed to support ConsoleKit:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233183
>
> Not
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:32:24PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Actually - can anyone confirm that their owner.key
> (~/.sugar/default/owner.key) is mode 600 or 400? As per my earlier
> email (below), I keep finding boxes with the wrong filemode...
Best examine olpc-configure; it regularly medd
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:35:02PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is now a sugar desktop profile in Debian Edu, it doesnt really work
> yet,
> but its there :)
>
> (Debian Edu modifies the debian installer so that you can choose between 4
> (or
> 6, in expert mode) profiles whic
[Resend to proper sw-eco address]
Hi,
I've spent some time debugging trac #6532: SD corruption on
suspend resume and propose that we provide some sort of update
with a proposed workaround as this is an issue that has been seen
by multiple G1G1 users. Doing a full USR may be overkill for this
i
Hi,
I've spent some time debugging trac #6532: SD corruption on
suspend resume and propose that we provide some sort of update
with a proposed workaround as this is an issue that has been seen
by multiple G1G1 users. Doing a full USR may be overkill for this
issue as we may just be able to pro
It looks like xinit in Fedora is supposed to support ConsoleKit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233183
Not sure why this would not be working...
Marco
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Note that the blood sprinkling and goat entrails talking to the camera
chip makes CAFE look good... We had to go to omnivision N times to get
new incantations of register read/writes during the development of the
driver.
- Jim
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 14:24 -0700, Deepak Saxen
On Jun 23 2008, at 17:58, Daniel Drake was caught saying:
> Hi,
>
> As you may have heard, olpc3 builds occasionally hang on boot during
> cafe_ccic/ov7670 initialization.
>
> Erik and myself tracked down the problem to this upstream commit, which
> has never been shipped in an olpc stream before
Sun Jun 22 20:51:53 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Project name : olpc-getone-activities
Done. Your tree is here:
git+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/activities/olpc-getone-utils
Please follow instructions here for importing your project:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Importing_your_project
Let us k
Hi,
As you may have heard, olpc3 builds occasionally hang on boot during
cafe_ccic/ov7670 initialization.
Erik and myself tracked down the problem to this upstream commit, which
has never been shipped in an olpc stream before olpc3:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Dear OLPC community member,
in cooperation with the software engineering research group at Free
University of Berlin (Freie Universität Berlin), we are currently
conducting an empirical survey on time consumption of participants in
Open Source/Free Software projects.
In this survey we want to fin
Actually - can anyone confirm that their owner.key
(~/.sugar/default/owner.key) is mode 600 or 400? As per my earlier
email (below), I keep finding boxes with the wrong filemode...
cheers, m
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Martin Langhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just spent a bit of time
Hi Marco,
On Monday 23 June 2008 21:39, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Do you actually want to use a specific dm for Sugar? If you are
> supporting multiple desktops at the same time you would better off
> just using gdm.
For that specific profile, I just want to support the sugar desktop :)
reg
Exactly! Jim sees the real problem.
We are dealing with stories here, not with any kind of reality.
Cheers,
Alan
- Original Message
From: Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jecel Assumpcao Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: its. an. education. project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; OLPC Devel
Sent:
2008/6/23 Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> there is now a sugar desktop profile in Debian Edu, it doesnt really work yet,
> but its there :)
>
> (Debian Edu modifies the debian installer so that you can choose between 4 (or
> 6, in expert mode) profiles which install specific sets of pa
Hi,
there is now a sugar desktop profile in Debian Edu, it doesnt really work yet,
but its there :)
(Debian Edu modifies the debian installer so that you can choose between 4 (or
6, in expert mode) profiles which install specific sets of packages and apply
certain preconfigurations.)
And now
My point is somewhat different: the only way out of the compilation
trust trap is another compiler. Unless someone has done this for gcc,
it has the identical problem, and there are many possible upstream
attacks. I see no reason (probably less) to trust the chain of trust
for gcc than I do Squea
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote on Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:57:52 -0400
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 02:50:59PM -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
> > > Plus it requires them (and users) to run the tools embedded into the
> > > possibly suspect image in order to describe itself. Do you see how
> > > there could be a trust p
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build2063
Changes in build 2063 from build: 2055
Size delta: 0.00M
-squeak-vm 3.10-3olpc3
+squeak-vm 3.10-3olpc4
--- Changes for squeak-vm 3.10-3olpc4 from 3.10-3olpc3 ---
+ Pango fixes, remove debug output
+ fix X11 drag-and-drop
--
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23.06.2008 20:29, Jim Gettys wrote:
>> While in theory, USB devices can/should send serial numbers, that part
>> of the spec is honored mostly by it's absence (due to cost).
>>
>> As John said, unfortunately, wi
On 23.06.2008 20:29, Jim Gettys wrote:
> While in theory, USB devices can/should send serial numbers, that part
> of the spec is honored mostly by it's absence (due to cost).
>
> As John said, unfortunately, with USB you have to go down to the device
> and see if they have something usable to disti
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What other kinds of tags including release numbers do you have in mind?
Build numbers, perhaps. But I am more concerned about the fact that
our trac install "tracks" several projects/subprojects. So I'd propose
"xo-8.2.1"
Using the following quick concoption...
--
#!/bin/bash
listpkgs() {
while read line; do
stream=${line##*.}
if [[ ${stream:0:2} == "fc" ]]; then
stream=${stream:0:2}
elif [[ ${stream:0:4} == "olpc" ]]; then
While in theory, USB devices can/should send serial numbers, that part
of the spec is honored mostly by it's absence (due to cost).
As John said, unfortunately, with USB you have to go down to the device
and see if they have something usable to distinguish devices.
- Jim
On
My experience is that you have to find a USB device parameter
(serial number, MAC address, etc.) that is different between the
two USB devices for this to ever work reliably.
wad
On Jun 23, 2008, at 10:37 AM, shivaprasad javali wrote:
> I was trying to use the port no to which the usb device is
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 02:27:04PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 03:38:25AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Make sense. Wonder why Michael has been using the rel- prefix?
>
> I attached the
Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> RESTORE
> Page Fault
> Ok
>
> Page Fault? What happened?
OpenFirmware error.
> Rerunning the command gives about the same result.
>
> So has my OLPC turned into a brick? Is there any point in trying to
> reinstall the OS?
Do you care about your data on the nand? If so
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:18 AM, David Farning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Kim stated earlier, in the end this becomes a cost of effort issue.
> >From a developer point of view the more releases the better. From a
> support perspective maintaining several long releases can quickly suck
> the
I was trying to use the port no to which the usb device is connected to
differentiate between two usb devices of the same type connected in my
application. For that I wanted the variant field between the two usb devices
so that I can uniquely identify them.
P.S: The output of lshal -m wasnt of muc
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:29 PM, David Farning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two releases per year make sense. Particularly when add in the fact that
> we have two hemispheres with opposing springs and falls.
Only if you assume we can get countries in lockstep with us. Any
number of things can di
Hi Kim -
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Kim Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Secondly, I am proposing that our Support team can only support one
> major release along with the current one. With school systems being
> run on yearly basis, this would suggest that we plan for 2 major
> releases p
2008/6/23 shivaprasad javali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I have a usb device to be used with my application which does not have
> any unique serial no. I noticed that when I connect two such devices to the
> XO , In the /proc/bus/usb/devices file the Bus for the two remains the same
> but
Hi,
I have a usb device to be used with my application which does not have
any unique serial no. I noticed that when I connect two such devices to the
XO , In the /proc/bus/usb/devices file the Bus for the two remains the same
but the port no is different for the two. When I connect the same
Ar 20/06/2008 am 12:50, ysgrifennodd Carol Lerche:
> If so, it hardly merits a speed comparison, since the functionality is
> entirely different.
I don't follow. Certainly the two are very different beasts, but given that I
was considering using them for the same purpose, surely a comparison is
ge
Hi all,
Great thanks all for the feedback and detailed discussions about this
problem. I'll wait before modifying the API for a while in such a scenario.
@Tomeu : Okay thanks, I'll get back to you once I try what you've told.
Best,
Hemant
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PR
Hi Hynek,
this summarizes pretty well my understanding of the issue.
Indeed, OLPC is in the process of updating from F-7 to F-9, and in the
later, python ships with a patch that addresses this issue. Not sure
about pygobject2 and pygtk2, though.
So Hemant, perhaps you would like to try an activi
45 matches
Mail list logo
