This is a good point and I hope Michael will be able to address it. If
there are any questions about how to get translations into pootle or
into a build, please post them so we can get them resolved quickly.
In order to help focus which translations are high priority for this
release, I have liste
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Mikus Grinbergs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Possibly Off-Topic !
>
> There was discussion of a GUI for removing an activity. But what
> does "to remove an activity" mean ?? Two extremes of user intent:
>
> User AA wants to install a new version of an Activity. He
2008/7/2 Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I personally really dislike being CC'd on lists im subscribed to I find it
> extremely poor netiquette of all the mailing lists im subscribed to
FWIW, I prefer the oppposite. My mail gets filtered in general
*unless* I'm explicitly named, either in
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:52 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We added a package named 'fonts-thai-ttf' to our builds a while ago
> for thai font support. However, no one here now remembers where this
> font came from, or where the upstream came from. Can someone familiar
> with t
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:26 AM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a place in SPI flash that marks the laptop as permanently
> unlocked, eliminating the need for a dev key or cryptographic
It is not safe to write to SPI flash routinely. Certainly not on
every lease renewal.
> The
The current OLPC design is heavily weighted toward reliability and
maintainability. That's all. There's really nothing more to be said:
we all agree that a full-fledged package manager would give more
flexibility at the expense of less reliability. Therefore we are not
using one at this time.
-
a minor point:
> Please add your own items to the list...
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Distro_Version_Migration_Nastiness
From http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC:Style_guide#Article_naming (I
didn't write it), it's considered MediaWiki good form to not capitalize
everything, thus just Distro_versio
Hello All,
I'm trying to set up some simple internationalization on a sugar activity
but am running in to problems. I am specifically using sugar-jhbuild and
launching it with 'LANG=es ./sugar-jhbuild run' command when I want to test
my internationalization out. Here are the steps I have followed
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2098
Changes in build 2098 from build: 2097
Size delta: 0.00M
-ohm 0.1.1-6.12.20080119git.olpc3
+ohm 0.1.1-6.13.20080701git.olpc3
--- Changes for ohm 0.1.1-6.13.20080701git.olpc3 from
0.1.1-6.12.20080119git.olpc3 ---
+ Fix OLPC Trac
> I would like just remind you that the real
> question is that if this "right" reply to setting is more or less
> important than keeping discussions on the devel list or not. I
> personally think that the latter is more important IMHO.
This can often be controlled by using 'mail-reader' facilitie
2008/7/2 Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> by setting the replyto the list i wont get ccd on email when people reply to
> all because that is the easy way to make sure it goes back to the list in the
> current setup. instead I will get responses via mailmain and not direct and
> the mail will
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Kim Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For testing, Scott, we are growing a set of each new keyboard/language
> laptop that comes out of manufacturing.
>
> The 'ultimate' test for fonts, translations, keyboard integration is to load
> a build on these laptops. I have
While preparing the 8.2 release (including the Fedora 9 rebase), we
found ourselves having to re-include dirty OLPC-specific package changes
from the older Fedora 7 releases. In fact, a number of the F9-induced
bugs were caused simply from accidently losing the OLPC-specific changes
we applied to p
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 10:18 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
> This probably dates from when Behdad was helping us with Thai rendering.
>
> Behdad, do you remember?
Yeah, I already replied. The Fedora thaifonts-scalable package
supersede that.
> - Jim
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-07-
bert wrote:
>
> Am 02.07.2008 um 20:01 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
>
> > On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >> Am 02.07.2008 um 19:33 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> >>> by setting the replyto the list i wont get ccd on email when people
> >>> reply to
> >>> all because that is t
Possibly Off-Topic !
There was discussion of a GUI for removing an activity. But what
does "to remove an activity" mean ?? Two extremes of user intent:
User AA wants to install a new version of an Activity. He would
like to remove the existing "executables", in case what any of them
do migh
Am 02.07.2008 um 20:01 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> Am 02.07.2008 um 19:33 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
>>> by setting the replyto the list i wont get ccd on email when people
>>> reply to
>>> all because that is the easy way to make sure it goes bac
On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> Am 02.07.2008 um 19:33 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> > by setting the replyto the list i wont get ccd on email when people
> > reply to
> > all because that is the easy way to make sure it goes back to the
> > list in the
> > current setup. instead
Am 02.07.2008 um 19:33 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> by setting the replyto the list i wont get ccd on email when people
> reply to
> all because that is the easy way to make sure it goes back to the
> list in the
> current setup. instead I will get responses via mailmain and not
> direct and
On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 03:27 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > -cdparanoia-libs alpha9.8-30
> > > +cdparanoia-libs 10.0-2.fc9
> > > -mesa-libGL 7.1-0.31.fc9
> > > +mesa-libGL 7.1-0.35.fc9
> > > -mesa-libGLU 7.1-0.31.fc9
> > > +mesa-libGLU 7.1-0.35
On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Carol Lerche wrote:
> I don't understand the argument that forcing "Reply-to" to be back to the
> list eradicates a list participant's ability to get the reply on their
> preferred email address. Presumably they replied to the list via this
> address. By forcing "Reply-
> On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 17:47 +0200, NoiseEHC wrote:
>
>> 1. olpc games sets the reply-to
>>
>
> Sounds like it should get fixed...
>
>
>> 2. BTW this recommendation does not make my point wrong (eg that the
>> current setting makes harder to keep conversations on the devel list)
>>
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 09:54 -0700, Carol Lerche wrote:
> I don't understand the argument that forcing "Reply-to" to be back to
> the list eradicates a list participant's ability to get the reply on
> their preferred email address. Presumably they replied to the list
> via this address.
This doe
I don't understand the argument that forcing "Reply-to" to be back to the
list eradicates a list participant's ability to get the reply on their
preferred email address. Presumably they replied to the list via this
address. By forcing "Reply-to" to the list address, all subscribers should
receive
On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Jim Gettys wrote:
> Here's mailman's recommendation about replyto...
>
> http://lists.laptop.org/admin/devel/?VARHELP=general/reply_goes_to_list
> - Jim
>
I personally really dislike being CC'd on lists im subscribed to I find it
extremely poor netiq
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 03:27 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -cdparanoia-libs alpha9.8-30
> > +cdparanoia-libs 10.0-2.fc9
> > -mesa-libGL 7.1-0.31.fc9
> > +mesa-libGL 7.1-0.35.fc9
> > -mesa-libGLU 7.1-0.31.fc9
> > +mesa-libGLU 7.1-0.35.fc9
>
> what is bringing in these as dependancies?
cdparan
jim wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 17:47 +0200, NoiseEHC wrote:
> > 1. olpc games sets the reply-to
>
> Sounds like it should get fixed...
>
> > 2. BTW this recommendation does not make my point wrong (eg that the
> > current setting makes harder to keep conversations on the devel list)
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 17:47 +0200, NoiseEHC wrote:
> 1. olpc games sets the reply-to
Sounds like it should get fixed...
> 2. BTW this recommendation does not make my point wrong (eg that the
> current setting makes harder to keep conversations on the devel list)
And screws many people who use r
Dear friends,
Please join me at the usual time and place to suggest bugs you think
should be marked 'blocks:8.2.0' and to inform me of your perceptions of
the current 'hot spots' in joyride.
Thanks,
Michael
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
1. olpc games sets the reply-to
2. BTW this recommendation does not make my point wrong (eg that the
current setting makes harder to keep conversations on the devel list)
Jim Gettys wrote:
> Here's mailman's recommendation about replyto...
>
> http://lists.laptop.org/admin/devel/?VARHELP=general/
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 06:03:55PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Erik Garrison wrote:
>>
>> There is another primary value-add, which is a different operating
>> system or window manager. To enable this value-add we could be
>> distributing a minimal image for each of the
As not everyone has admin access on mailman.laptop.org, here is the
text to which JG linked:
reply_goes_to_list (general): Where are replies to list messages
directed? Poster is strongly recommended for most mailing lists.
This option controls what Mailman does to the Reply-To: header in
m
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:41 AM, David Leeming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFTER clicking register, and rebooting, it won't find the school mesh and
> eventually settles on teh simple mesh. Then olpc-netstatus reports:
- Have you connected successfully with this machine? (we've seen a
small % of
David,
Please send us the tarball generated by olpc-netlog, as
well as the /var/log/messages from the school server.
I'm cc'ing Michail, as this appears to be a networking problem.
wad
On Jul 2, 2008, at 5:41 AM, David Leeming wrote:
> I am still having problems getting three XOs working
Here's mailman's recommendation about replyto...
http://lists.laptop.org/admin/devel/?VARHELP=general/reply_goes_to_list
- Jim
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 09:19 +0200, NoiseEHC wrote:
> >
> > There are top-down decisions being made by a few people that drive the
> > direction o
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:43 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>
> While we're at it: why are we including libthai-devel, consisting
> mostly of a whole bunch of .h files? Is there some need for that I'm
> missing (and can I test it)?
Building Pango requires that, but not at runtime.
> --scott
--
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:19 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> >>
> >> We added a package named 'fonts-thai-ttf' to our builds a while ago
> >> for thai font support. However, no one here
This probably dates from when Behdad was helping us with Thai rendering.
Behdad, do you remember?
- Jim
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 17:52 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> We added a package named 'fonts-thai-ttf' to our builds a while ago
> for thai font support. However, n
The other issue it would be nice to get fixed is the jffs2 full
performance falling off the wall cliff, for which there is a patch that
the Nokia folks have deployed. While in development we seldom run full,
running full is likely the usual state in the field.
Dave, have you had a chance to look
Am 02.07.2008 um 13:31 schrieb Mikus Grinbergs:
>> as far as mesa goes, the list has been very adament that the XO
>> laptop
>> cannot run any opengl stuff, and my understanding is mesa exists to
>> implement a software version of opengl. either position is
>> reasonable (no
>> opengl+ no mes
> as far as mesa goes, the list has been very adament that the XO laptop
> cannot run any opengl stuff, and my understanding is mesa exists to
> implement a software version of opengl. either position is reasonable (no
> opengl+ no mesa or mesa with slow opengl support), but right now it's a
> cont
Hi,
I am trying to run sugar desktop environment on Fedora 7 after installing
it using yum. This is the output i get when i try to run it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sugar
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/sugar-shell", line 30, in
from main import main
File "/usr/share/sugar
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Build Announcer v2 wrote:
> -cdparanoia-libs alpha9.8-30
> +cdparanoia-libs 10.0-2.fc9
> -mesa-libGL 7.1-0.31.fc9
> +mesa-libGL 7.1-0.35.fc9
> -mesa-libGLU 7.1-0.31.fc9
> +mesa-libGLU 7.1-0.35.fc9
what is bringing in these as dependancies?
for machines that would only ever se
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4 - Support time frame.
> GS - I agree that release should be supported until the second
> subsequent release is out (ala Fedora). Do we have consensus on that?
+1
> Is it useful for the rest of you already working on the pr
Am 02.07.2008 um 02:13 schrieb Michael Stone:
> ear world,
I'm all ears ;)
> We're FREEZING OUR FEATURE-SET THIS WEEK, which means that features
> targeted at
> the 8.2.0 release should be IN A JOYRIDE BUILD BY THIS SUNDAY, JULY
> 6TH. If the
> outlines of your feature aren't
>
> a) in Joyr
> ...I suspect that [delay]'s the ~1.5s it takes to verify the signature on the
> dev key. For many deployments that will be 1.5s to check a signature
> on an activation lease. The original design was to cache that check
> in some secure manner, but there's not really any appropriate
> protected
>
> There are top-down decisions being made by a few people that drive the
> direction of OLPC. These decisions are not waiting for consensus, and
> they are made by a small number of people. I don't believe this is
> going to change (at least not in the short term).
>
I, personally, do not car
47 matches
Mail list logo
