http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/xo-1/streams/8.2/build753
Changes in build 753 from build: 751
Size delta: -50.33M
-ohm 0.1.1-6.14.20080707git.olpc3
+ohm 0.1.1-6.17.20080805git.olpc3
+olpc-netutils 0.4-1.olpc3
+ntp-ntpdate 4.2.4p4-7.olpc3
-libertas-usb8388-firmware 2:5.110.22.p14-1.fc9
+liber
"Martin Langhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> But my point was that, at the moment, you can choose to "Erase" an item, and
>>> it's gone forever. I expect that many kids will do this, and will at some
>>> point
>>> regret erasing some item.
>>
>> Yes. This is a request that has been made her
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Eduardo Heleno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> But my point was that, at the moment, you can choose to "Erase" an item, and
>> it's gone forever. I expect that many kids will do this, and will at some
>> point
>> regret erasi
"Eduardo Heleno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But my point was that, at the moment, you can choose to "Erase" an item, and
> it's gone forever. I expect that many kids will do this, and will at some
> point
> regret erasing some item.
Yes. This is a request that has been made here in Haïti.
I
2008/8/19 Zarro Boogs per Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> #8041: Sugar lacks a "Trash/Recycle bin" system
>
> +---
> Reporter: HoboPrimate | Owner: Eben
> Type: enhancement | Status: new
> Prio
2008/8/9 Christoph Derndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> This isn't really a bug but rather a general observation so I'm not quite
> sure where to put it...
>
> When you're in the software-update panel of the contro
Richard Smith wrote:
> I have a new test firmware up for all you brave firmware testers.
> Last time I didn't give it enough soak time before rolling a q2e13 and
> had to brown bag it. So I'd appreciate testing across a bunch of
> different builds.
>
> http://dev.laptop.org/~rsmith/q20158.rom
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2311
Changes in build 2311 from build: 2301
Size delta: 0.14M
-cerebro 2.9.11-1.olpc3
+cerebro 2.9.12-1.olpc3
-ds-backup-client 0.6-1.olpc3
+ds-backup-client 0.7-1.olpc3
-olpc-licenses 1-1
+olpc-licenses 2-1.olpc3
--- Changes for cerebr
Why are new versions of Joyride not announced?
Pol
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On 18 Aug 2008, at 00:54, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Gary C Martin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just a quick double check – I take it that all yum attempted installs
>> will also be failing at the moment? Having re-flashed my XO last
>> night
>> I was trying t
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello translators,
> It looks like we have got some new strings (no string freeze break
> though - apparently my POT updater broke for a few projects). Affected
> modules include sugar and journal (project glucose 0.82
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We don't have a maintainer for the 8.2 build branch at the moment, so
> it's not trivial to do this. I think Michael is planning on continuing
> to just use Joyride as the stream that will produce 8.2, until we get
> a new (o
I've revived and turned the crank on the 8.2 branch in preparations
for forking a stable stream from joyride. The build announcers will
probably shortly announce build 753, which should be more-or-less
identical to the latest joyride. You can try it out with:
# olpc-update 8.2-753
Although I w
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Guillaume Desmottes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on the ejabberd package for the XS. We'd like to provide an
> updated package based on ejabberd 2.0.1 which "just work" once is
> installed. The goal is of course to simplify as much as possible the
> dep
I have a new test firmware up for all you brave firmware testers. Last
time I didn't give it enough soak time before rolling a q2e13 and had to
brown bag it. So I'd appreciate testing across a bunch of different builds.
http://dev.laptop.org/~rsmith/q20158.rom
Thanks.
--
Richard Smith <[EM
fter reverting, I will attempt to get gstreamer developers involved in
> fixing those bugs. I wonder if the fact that we are shipping such an old
> version would act as motivation for them to help fix it. I will try and
> get them hardware through the developer program.
>
> I can t
Hi,
> How do people feel about the above?
Excellent, we should do that and retarget the more involved work for the
next release.
> Assuming we go ahead, I feel this would be a good time to enter
> change control. We would only implement the gstreamer reversion in
> the 8.2 branch, an
m to help fix it. I will try and
get them hardware through the developer program.
I can take care of everything on the Fedora/rebuilding side. RPMs here:
http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20080819/
How do people feel about the above?
Assuming we go ahead, I feel this would be a good time to enter c
Hello all!
For 9.1 on, I suggest the release schedule to happen before people
begin to take their breaks.
December and August are probably hard months to get a big team push,
due to vacations.
Maybe it would be the case to bring this to June and November.
Just a thought.
Cheers!
Ricardo
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 02:13:28PM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
>>We don't have a duplicate of Koji we can use? How wrong is that!
>
> We talked about it but Dennis argued passionately that
>
> a) creating our own koji i
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 8:27 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyway, in the meantime, we have raw rpmbuild, mock (which needs to be
>> configured not to use Fedora's koji, but this is not so hard), our own
>> buildroot (probably hidden away somewhere on weka.laptop.org), and the
>> j
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Eduardo Heleno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/9 Christoph Derndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [snip]
>
>
>>
>> This isn't really a bug but rather a general observation so I'm not quite
Hi,
I'm working on the ejabberd package for the XS. We'd like to provide an
updated package based on ejabberd 2.0.1 which "just work" once is
installed. The goal is of course to simplify as much as possible the
deployment of ejabberd servers for schools and community users.
My current package is
23 matches
Mail list logo
