"C. Scott Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But it appears that the Help activity (for example) is not listed in
>> these pages. What URL should I use?
>
> You should use the URL listed on the [[Activities/G1G1]] page. The
> data is machine-readable; there is a parser at:
>
>
> http://d
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Mikus Grinbergs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Applications which I intend to use in the near future I keep
> "resident" (Sugar Activities in /home/olpc/Activities, Linux
> applications on my "permanent" SD card). Those I access rarely I
> keep on a removable storage
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Read has serious memory problems because renders whole pages
> into memory, regardless of what is the viewed area. Any chance the
> first pages of the PDF you opened contained big images?
Nope, it's a saved Project Gutenberg PDF
Coradella_Collegiate_Bookshelf_Collection_aus
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Carlos Nazareno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ugh.
>
> Okay, in an attempt to get sound working with Gnash 8.3.0
> (preinstalled with build 766), I did the following:
>
> su
> wget http://rpm.livna.org/livna-release-9.rpm
> rpm -vi livna-release-9.rpm
>
> Now livna is
Is http://wiki.laptop.org/ down or vandalized? Since about 10 PM PST
last night all I get is a blank page when I try to connect to the
home page.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Best guess is a success disaster: the server needs more RAM...
Henry's scrambling to upgrade the system.
- Jim
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 08:13 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is http://wiki.laptop.org/ down or vandalized? Since about 10 PM PST
> last night all I get is a bla
How about putting up a simple page saying the main system is down for
maintenance?
That would at least be a bit better than complete failure to serve
pages.
On Oct 1, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> Best guess is a success disaster: the server needs more RAM...
>
> Henry's scrambling t
C. Scott Ananian writes:
> The response usually is that additional context is sufficient to
> disambiguate tag sets, you don't actually need ordering. That is,
> it's okay if a/b is indistinguishable from b/a -- in practice one
> will really be c/a/b and the other will be b/a/d or whatever, and
>
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2501
Changes in build 2501 from build: 2500
Size delta: 0.39M
-e2fsprogs 1.40.8-3.fc9
+e2fsprogs 1.41.0-2.fc9
-e2fsprogs-libs 1.40.8-3.fc9
+e2fsprogs-libs 1.41.0-2.fc9
-wget 1.11.1-1.fc9
+wget 1.11.4-1.fc9
--- Changes for e2fsprogs 1.41
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:34 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>>> Requesting dev keys should not be difficult! How can we fix that problem?
>>
>> one headache (at least f
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2502
Changes in build 2502 from build: 2501
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpc-library-common 1-30
+olpc-library-common 1-31
--- Changes for olpc-library-common 1-31 from 1-30 ---
+ updated/clarified link to the 'update' page so it can be focuse
I just finished taking apart an XO that had been immersed in flood water
for several days. It wasn't a pretty sight. The conclusion is that
such a
laptop is not a candidate for repair (with the possible exception of
the display.)
Additional details at:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Immersio
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2503
Changes in build 2503 from build: 2502
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar 0.82.9-2.olpc3
+sugar 0.82.9-3.olpc3
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See htt
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/xo-1/streams/8.2/build767
Changes in build 767 from build: 766
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpcrd 0.47-0
+olpcrd 0.48-0
-olpc-library-common 1-28
+olpc-library-common 1-30
-sugar 0.82.9-2.olpc3
+sugar 0.82.9-3.olpc3
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/xo-1/streams/8.2/build767
Full changelog at:
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=projects/pilgrim;a=shortlog;h=8.2
http://mock.laptop.org/gitweb/?p=repos;a=shortlog;h=koji.dist-olpc3-testin
Carlos Nazareno wrote:
>
> Now the worst part is that now I can't
> yum update
>
> says I'm missing network dependencies :-/
>
> :(
>
> -Naz
>
Howdy,
Try Sudo Yum Update -x where is whichever one
that is missing dependencies. If one package won't yum update then none in
the queue will yu
Mitch and I have come up with a way to ship G1G1 laptops so that they
will pretty-boot, but still come from the factory without any need
for developer keys (in the Forth "disable-security" setting).
This requires a small edit to /boot/olpc.fth in the OS build,
to load the XO child image, freeze
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 19:15 -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
> I know the support crew would be much happier if G1G1 laptops were
> shipped able to run test builds and patched software, if users could
> interact with Forth to diagnose their hardware, if they could run
> unsigned Forth code from USB colle
I don't mind if the G1G1 donors have the option to participate in
testing secured laptops, but I utterly reject the notion that we can
jerk customer/donors around like this without their permission in
advance. They _will_ complain publicly.
Engineering and marketing should never have the authority
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Edward Cherlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't mind if the G1G1 donors have the option to participate in
> testing secured laptops, but I utterly reject the notion that we can
> jerk customer/donors around like this without their permission in
> advance. They _
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:51 AM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to know what version you are updating *from*.
> --scott
Seeing the same problem with 8.2-764, updating to 8.2-766 - the error
complains about the contents manifest line 319 .
cheers,
martin
--
[EMAIL PROTE
I've written up my recent testing of ejabberd for the wiki:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ejabberd_resource_tests
It is not completely satisfactory: I don't have the resources to test
up to 3000 active users which I believe is an important target. At
lower numbers, however, ejabberd's memory consump
I wrote:
> It is not completely satisfactory: I don't have the resources to test
> up to 3000 active users which I believe is an important target.
Just to clarify this: it was actually client resources I ran out of,
not the server (though that must have been getting close to melt
down).
I used h
23 matches
Mail list logo
