On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Mitch Bradley wrote:
David Lang wrote:
ideally I want to figure out how to get these keys into the kernel, at
that point any userspace can deal with them.
The game keys produce scancodes that are folded into the keyboard data
stream. The kernel sees them interspersed
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:07:30AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to find out what the scancodes are, so that I can then document how
to get them mapped to keystokes via some mechanism similar to the kernel
keymaps (for console stuff) and xkb (for X stuff). the idea being that
once
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, James Cameron wrote:
the current situation seems to be that the scancodes don't map to
anything, the OLPC Sugar build is grabbing and processing the raw
scancodes and taking action on them.
Certainly not. The kernel is receiving scancodes, translating them to
keycodes,
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:45 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
[many poignant words]
If you'll allow me to barge in on this conversation for but a moment...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468744
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 07:45:07PM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
Some scancodes have no mapping to keycodes in the kernel on debxo, yet
they have a mapping on the OLPC OS build.
Because the mapping has not gone upstream yet.
On OLPC OS build 757, loadkeys is run by /etc/init.d/olpc-configure,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:28:15AM -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:45 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
[many poignant words]
Poignant? That's a new one. ;-)
If you'll allow me to barge in on this conversation for but a moment...
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:45 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
[many poignant words]
If you'll allow me to barge in on this conversation for but a moment...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D468744
thanks, that looks like exactly
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 06:27 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 20:57 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:28:15AM -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
If you'll allow me to barge in on this conversation for but a moment...
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:17:14 +0200, Bruno Coudoin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. Project name : GCompris
Done. Your tree is here:
git+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/activities/gcompris
Please follow instructions here for importing your project:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Importing_your_project
Let us
Le lundi 03 novembre 2008 à 10:39 -0500, Henry Edward Hardy a écrit :
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:17:14 +0200, Bruno Coudoin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. Project name : GCompris
Done. Your tree is here:
git+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/activities/gcompris
Please follow instructions here for
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 20:57 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:28:15AM -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
If you'll allow me to barge in on this conversation for but a moment...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468744
By all means. Thanks. hal-info is
RE Suspend / Resume : talk to CJB(Chris Ball) about OHM. I spoke with him a
few weeks ago and, if I recall correctly, all one needs to do is use the
official OLPC Kernel and install the OHM packages.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, James Cameron
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:30 PM, S Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Schampijer wrote:
This is our first Development Release in the 0.84 cycle. The code base
has seen many refactoring efforts to improve the platform.
Will OLPC joyride builds pick up the new Sucrose?
This sounds right. The OHM packages aren't in any debian repo afaik, so
we'll have to package them. Then we'd need a debian repository for
these packages.
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:53:40AM -0500, Ian Daniher wrote:
RE Suspend / Resume : talk to CJB(Chris Ball) about OHM. I spoke with him a
Hi guys,
I run a support gang member and I run a XO repair in Miami, FL.
I don't know if it's a known issue already but whenever I do a XO self test
on new build or firmware (I don't know if it runs from firmware or build) it
doesn't get to the keyboard test.
After the mouse test passes, it
[cc:ing devel]
My understanding of cpuidle is that it is designed to be fairly CPU/system
agnostic with a clean driver interface to allow for tweaking the CPU/SOC
idle control. There is even an ARM port [1] but as you will see in that
email, the nomenclature for CPU idle states has been heavily
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 18:06, Bruno Coudoin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 03 novembre 2008 à 10:39 -0500, Henry Edward Hardy a écrit :
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:17:14 +0200, Bruno Coudoin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. Project name : GCompris
Done. Your tree is here:
git+ssh://[EMAIL
On Nov 03 2008, at 12:45, Richard A. Smith was caught saying:
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c:
result = cpuidle_register_driver(acpi_idle_driver);
looking at this file I see that its called from
static int __init acpi_processor_init(void)
This is the same routine that creates a /proc/acpi
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 01:24:00AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
right now nothing shows up if I run this from an xterm
Works for me. I was doing it on debxo KDE. What were you trying it on?
xev is /usr/bin/xev, provided by the x11-utils package.
--
James Cameronmailto:[EMAIL
On 03/11/08 09:31 -0800, Deepak Saxena wrote:
[cc:ing devel]
My understanding of cpuidle is that it is designed to be fairly CPU/system
agnostic with a clean driver interface to allow for tweaking the CPU/SOC
idle control. There is even an ARM port [1] but as you will see in that
email, the
On Nov 03 2008, at 13:41, Jordan Crouse was caught saying:
The concept of suspend is muddled greatly with kernel and userspace folks
both participating in the discussion and coming at the problem from
different directions. As Deepak says, the dream is to put the whole system
to sleep on a
On 03/11/08 13:12 -0800, Deepak Saxena wrote:
On Nov 03 2008, at 13:41, Jordan Crouse was caught saying:
The concept of suspend is muddled greatly with kernel and userspace folks
both participating in the discussion and coming at the problem from
different directions. As Deepak says, the
The technical miniconference (AKA XO Camp) has been rescheduled from
November, 2008 to early January, 2009. The agenda and exact dates are
under construction at: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XOcamp_2
Future feature requests and roadmap goals are being collected at:
I have now an account at dev.laptop.org and moved the bundles there.
The olpc GCompris wiki page now direct downloads there.
Thanks everybody for your help and patience.
--
Bruno Coudoin
http://gcompris.net Free educational software for kids
http://toulibre.org Logiciel Libre à Toulouse
Jordan Crouse wrote:
appropriate hook. But if we want to suspend on idle, then we need to
do it while are... you know... idle - so something has to live there.
I think we are basically saying the same thing here - userspace needs
to give us the go-ahead to suspend, and we need to have the
On Nov 03 2008, at 17:11, Richard A. Smith was caught saying:
Jordan Crouse wrote:
appropriate hook. But if we want to suspend on idle, then we need to
do it while are... you know... idle - so something has to live there.
I think we are basically saying the same thing here - userspace
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to find out what the scancodes are, so that I can then document how
to get them mapped to keystokes via some mechanism similar to the kernel
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ec_specification#KeyCodes_for_Buttons
--
Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per
The bad news is the last lot of testing I did is very untrustworthy,
due to the shared roster not working[1].
The good news is I've repeated the tests, with the shared roster. Not
so good, is the results aren't so good.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ejabberd_resource_tests/try_5
Counting only
29 matches
Mail list logo
