sudo mu !
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
>
Anyway, why does this wiki page tell you to enter
sudo su -
>>
>> Some future zen compilation of sudo may support infinite nesting of
>> levels of protectedness, s
Vaguely related, I had did some work to avoid the gray circles: you
can see the result at:
http://dev.laptop.org/~sayamindu/standard_icons.png
The relevant patch (it needs some work) is at http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8661
I'll resume work on it when I have some more time - in the meanwhile,
if a
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I'm
not a python programmer so searching through
the source entails quite a learning curve...
Perhaps someone with real knowledge of the
internals can suggest an approach or more
specifics about where to look.
--Chris
Tony Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't
I'm quiet sure if we can answer these Koans correctly they won't be a
problem :)
http://www.ccil.org/jargon/jargon_47.html#SEC54
Still seeing how I can help out with OLPC, given myself two months until I
start something. Will check and see what the TODO list is like. Been
working too much with t
Yes, but these are un-sugarized programs
and they still generate gray circles.
Doesn't that imply that window creation
outside of sugar is being detected and
acted upon?
--Chris
Tony Anderson wrote:
> Compare:
>
> http://laguna.fmedic.unam.mx/~daniel/pygtutorial/pygtutorial/getting-started.html
Compare:
http://laguna.fmedic.unam.mx/~daniel/pygtutorial/pygtutorial/getting-started.html
which creates a top-level window and
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/PyGTK/Hello_World_Tutorial
as a sugar activity.
The first has the line:
window = GtkWindow(WINDOW_TOPLEVEL) # create a top level window
wh
Two specific questions come to mind:
(1) How does Sugar know that a new top level
window has been instantiated? Is there a
hook from the X server or what?
(2) What sort of cleanup is needed to make
the anonymous gray circle go away? Do
you have to notify Sugar or what?
I'm
Needed to get a developer key for a XO. Clicked on the provided
field in Browse - it timed out. Ended up extracting the request
from /home, carrying it to a desktop machine, issuing the request in
a browser there, creating an exception for the invalid certificate
at activation.laptop.org -- a
>> I'm not sure if it was considered, but as the maintainer of swfdec in
>> Fedora I can state that swfdec is very cpu-intensive, and I have my
>> doubts whether the performance on the XO would be comparable to gnash's,
>> though it might be worth investigating.
>
> That has been my experience too,
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Brian Pepple wrote:
> Quick clarification. We discussed making swfdec installed by default
> during the development of Fedora 9, but decided against doing so since
> we felt it wasn't quite ready for that.
>
Ah, thanks for the clarification, I don't run Fedora so
Hi Chris,
> > I would remove the old fc9 build from the olpc_development repo (or
> > even have one for 8.2.0 and one for 9.1.0 so they don't get mixed
> > up). Surely it should be pulling cyrus-sasl from the Fedora repos
> > anyway?
>
> I've just pushed a patch to pilgrim's joyride branc
Hi Peter,
> I would remove the old fc9 build from the olpc_development repo (or
> even have one for 8.2.0 and one for 9.1.0 so they don't get mixed
> up). Surely it should be pulling cyrus-sasl from the Fedora repos
> anyway?
I've just pushed a patch to pilgrim's joyride branch to sw
12 matches
Mail list logo
