On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> > How do we prevent cheating between students?
>
> You can't prevent this.
Exactly. I've been working with online tools for education for ~8
years now, and it's interesting to note - paper+pen technology does
not prevent cheating either.
A
Hi Carlos,
I hope you don't mind if I give some blunt/opinionated answers:
> How do we protect children from accessing porn or other
> questionable content, and how do we prevent malicious persons from
> communicating with kids, like say, child predators in IRC?
You can't prevent this,
Hi guys.
Here's one problem we have.
How do we protect children from accessing porn or other questionable
content, and how do we prevent malicious persons from communicating
with kids, like say, child predators in IRC?
It's been said that people should pass a license exam before being
allowed to
gary c martin wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> On 10 Jan 2009, at 17:29, p...@laptop.org wrote:
>
> > (i'd appreciate it someone running an 8.2.1
> > staging candidate could verify these parameters really are present --
> > i'm running a development kernel.)
>
> Not sure if this helps, but just loo
Hi Paul
On 10 Jan 2009, at 17:29, p...@laptop.org wrote:
> (i'd appreciate it someone running an 8.2.1
> staging candidate could verify these parameters really are present --
> i'm running a development kernel.)
Not sure if this helps, but just looked in /sys/module/psmouse/
parameters/* on an
Version 090110 of the XO-LiveCD is available for download from:
ftp://rohrmoser-engineering.de/pub/XO-LiveCD/XO-LiveCD_090110.iso
This release is still based on the stable 8.2 build:
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/8.2/build767/devel_ext3/
but has significant improvements
sigh. when am i going to learn not to tweak shell scripts
in my mailer buffer
i wrote:
>
> if [ $(whoami) = root ]
please change that to
if [ $(whoami) != root ]
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@
current staging releases (9 and higher, i believe) contain some
new parameters which were added to the mouse driver. these
settings allow tweaking various timeouts related to touchpad
recalibration. (i'd appreciate it someone running an 8.2.1
staging candidate could verify these parameters reall
On 10.01.2009, at 12:53, S Page wrote:
> If the activity developer has somehow learned how to update activity
> versions (again I ask *is this documented anywhere?!*)
The canonical documentation AFAIK is the update_url section of
the .info file in bundles:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activity_bun
Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
>> WHERE are they supposed to look to determine whether a "newer"
>> version of an Activity is available for their (e.g., 657) builds ?
>> [Their builds are __older__ than 8.2.]
For 8.1, http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Bert%2
>> I don't think there are any other than the kernel that are forked for
>> hardware issues, and the stock Fedora i386 kernel will work with the
>> XO but the likes of numerous ethernet/storage drivers, ISA, MCA, Token
>> Ring and the like are of little use for the device :-) . There use to
>> be a
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I see two classes of forks
>>
>> 1. forks to use different compile/packaging options to eliminate
>> dependancies
>>
>> 2. forks to change the code (adding functionality in particular)
>>
>> I'm not _that_ interested in #1, but am very inte
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> I don't think there are any other than the kernel that are forked for
>>> hardware issues, and the stock Fedora i386 kernel will work with the
>>> XO but the likes of numerous ethernet/storage drivers, ISA, MCA, Token
>>> Ring and the like are of litt
>> I don't think there are any other than the kernel that are forked for
>> hardware issues, and the stock Fedora i386 kernel will work with the
>> XO but the likes of numerous ethernet/storage drivers, ISA, MCA, Token
>> Ring and the like are of little use for the device :-) . There use to
>> be a
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I see two classes of forks
>>
>> 1. forks to use different compile/packaging options to eliminate
>> dependancies
>>
>> 2. forks to change the code (adding functionality in particular)
>>
>> I'm not _that_ interested in #1, but am very interested in #2
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> WHERE are they supposed to look to determine whether a "newer"
> version of an Activity is available for their (e.g., 657) builds ?
> [Their builds are __older__ than 8.2.]
Unfortunately, we do not have any page set up for this, and I don'
> I see two classes of forks
>
> 1. forks to use different compile/packaging options to eliminate
> dependancies
>
> 2. forks to change the code (adding functionality in particular)
>
> I'm not _that_ interested in #1, but am very interested in #2, especially
> anything done to make things work wit
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> There's a discussion going on right now at FUDCon with gregdek and cjb
>>> running down the 20 or so forked packages and smoothing out how to
>>> merge them back in. So there should be helpful updates soon.
>>
>> Don't forget that we have not yet for
>> There's a discussion going on right now at FUDCon with gregdek and cjb
>> running down the 20 or so forked packages and smoothing out how to
>> merge them back in. So there should be helpful updates soon.
>
> Don't forget that we have not yet forked F10 to the extent that we did
> F9 to get rid
I have seen the wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2 page list
Activity versions that were *older* than those listed for "plain"
G1G1.
>>> That's exactly as it is supposed to work. G1G1 lists dev versions,
>>> G1G1/8.2 the stable versions tested with 8.2.
I did say 'o.k.' to this
20 matches
Mail list logo
