Brian Jordan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the Sucrose package of Pippy is version 25 - when I last released it
>>> back in August. Since then there has been some development going into
>>> Pippy (now version 30)
>>> ht
hey guys, here in Nepal we are deciding whether or not to turn off the
mesh on our custom XO build in order to save power. We will leave on
regular wifi.
Any ideas on how much power we will actually save? An extra hour of
battery life would be worth it
--
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE
hey guys, here in Nepal we are deciding whether or not to turn off the
mesh on our custom XO build in order to save power. We will leave on
regular wifi.
Any ideas on how much power we will actually save? An extra hour of
battery life would be worth it
--
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE
Guys,
could someone update the mock 8.2.1 repos git repo?
would make my life a lot easier and seems like a sensible thing to do.
Thanks a lot!
/Ties
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Kim Quirk kindly stopped by #olpc-meeting this evening and precipitated an
>
On 27.01.2009, at 05:33, S Page wrote:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Friends_in_testing still points to staging-7
> and says "The 8.2.1 build is currently identical to 8.2.0". ??!
It still is identical:
http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/8.2-8.2.1.html
"Staging" is not "8.2.1" (yet).
- Bert -
__
2009/1/27 S Page :
> `sudo olpc-update staging-9` gives
> "I don't think the requested build number exists."
I get the same for staging-11, I guess we have to use the full .img
(or olpc-update --usb) for now:
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/xo-1/streams/staging/build11/devel_jffs2/
Daniel
__
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:57 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Wade Brainerd wrote:
>
> Here's to staying focused,
>>
>
> agreed, but I don't see how you can do a keyboard and not have some
> multi-touch stuff (shift keys to start with)
>
> I am in the group that has serious doubts about the cur
There seems to be a differing set of instructions on how to upgrade:
from the wiki:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XS_Installing_Software#Upgrading_from_XS_0.4_or_earlier
"If you are upgrading from XS 0.4 or earlier, the process is similar to
a new installation, with some minor changes. In the menu sh
Jigish,
I am convinced that my installation of openSUSE 11.1 is messed up and my
best option is to do a fresh install rather than an upgrade. David
Fanning had asked me to do a ./sugar-jhbuild depscheck and the only way
I could run that was to do a git-clone of sugar-jhbuild first. When I
tr
Tomeu,
As I have described in a previous email, I think my openSUSE 11.1
upgrade is messed up. Several files seem to be missing even though YAST
and rpm -V show the packages being installed. I plan to do a fresh
install rather than an upgrade to see if that helps.
I did run the command you
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/xo-1/streams/staging/build13
Changes in build 13 from build: 11
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar-journal 100-1.olpc3
+sugar-journal 101-1.olpc3
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/staging-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/xo-1/streams/staging/build13
Changes in build 13 from build: 11
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar-journal 100-1.olpc3
+sugar-journal 101-1.olpc3
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/staging-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See
This is a reminder of the weekly VIG meeting at 4 PM EST in #olpc-
admin on oftc.
I have had a few things come up and I will be unable to attend or
chair the meeting today. Henry has generously volunteered to serve as
our secretary; if someone else would like to step in to chair today's
me
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/xo-1/streams/staging/build15
Changes in build 15 from build: 13
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpc-utils 0.89-5.olpc3
+olpc-utils 0.89-6.olpc3
-libX11 1.1.4-3.olpc3
+libX11 1.1.4-4.olpc3
-xkeyboard-config 1.3-6.olpc3
+xkeyboard-config 1.3-7.olpc3
--
This mail was autom
You can download the iso here:
http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/1/Soas-200901271941.iso
Instructions on how to install it are here:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick
I also made an experimental image for the XO. It's not signed, so you
will need security disabled, if you want
AMD sees no Geode chip replacement in sight
AMD on Monday said it has no replacement for the aging Geode low-power
chips that are used in netbooks and set-top boxes.
http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/274414/amd_sees_no_geode_chip_replacement_sight
Looks like AMD's going to be pulling out of th
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
>e of the economic crunch.
>
> This is completely wrong and low-power + efficiency is exactly where
> all computing should go. multicore GHz monsters should be sold to
> people who really need them and not to joe average who just needs to
> s
Hi Marco,
On 27 Jan 2009, at 23:00, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> You can download the iso here:
>
> http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/1/Soas-200901271941.iso
>
> Instructions on how to install it are here:
>
> http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick
>
> I also made an experimental im
Hi.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Jeffrey Kesselman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Carlos Nazareno
> wrote:
> >e of the economic crunch.
> >
> > This is completely wrong and low-power + efficiency is exactly where
> > all computing should go. multicore GHz monsters should be sold t
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> AMD sees no Geode chip replacement in sight
> AMD on Monday said it has no replacement for the aging Geode low-power
> chips that are used in netbooks and set-top boxes.
> http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/274414/amd_sees_no_geode_chip
it's the low power part that's very important here. it's the XO's
incredibly low power consumption that really sets it apart from any
other currently in production computer (excluding smartphones and
pdas).
I'm not really familiar with the new processors from Intel
(silverthorne, diamondville) and
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> it's the low power part that's very important here. it's the XO's
> incredibly low power consumption that really sets it apart from any
> other currently in production computer (excluding smartphones and
> pdas).
Of course! But, I was qui
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> > AMD sees no Geode chip replacement in sight
> > AMD on Monday said it has no replacement for the aging Geode low-power
> > chips that are used in netbooks and set-top boxes.
> > http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/274414/amd_sees_no_g
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> Looks like AMD's going to be pulling out of the low-power computing
> space because of the economic crunch.
At least they're not completely shutting down the fabrication of
existing technologies that would still need Geode-type of componen
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Network_principles#Name_resolution
Even if we were to do all sorts of DNS smartypants stuff - the only
protocol where we can play games is http. The protocol is highly
proxy-able, redirect-able and nimble, and most
Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> Do ARM processors do these things better than anything else on the
> market right now? but then you lose the X86 compatibility and this
> probably breaks things for cross-platform upstream contributions for
> any deved/researched write-once-run-many apps/projects. (correct
> hey guys, here in Nepal we are deciding whether or not to turn off the
> mesh on our custom XO build in order to save power. We will leave on
> regular wifi.
>
> Any ideas on how much power we will actually save? An extra hour of
> battery life would be worth it
(1) Try it and see, that's prob
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:49 PM, James Simmons
wrote:
> Jigish,
>
> I am convinced that my installation of openSUSE 11.1 is messed up and my
> best option is to do a fresh install rather than an upgrade. David Fanning
> had asked me to do a ./sugar-jhbuild depscheck and the only way I could run
>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
>
>> > AMD sees no Geode chip replacement in sight
>> > AMD on Monday said it has no replacement for the aging Geode low-power
>> > chips that are used in netbooks and set-top boxes.
>
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/xo-1/streams/staging/build21
Changes in build 21 from build: 15
Size delta: 0.00M
-libX11 1.1.4-4.olpc3
+libX11 1.1.4-5.olpc3
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/staging-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See http://de
It's a bit of a non-event, the code has been "there" for quite a
while. So I am just making it official: 0.5.1 is the XS image to use.
Grab it at http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/
It fixes the issues outlined in
https://dev.laptop.org/query?group=milestone&milestone=xs-0.5.1&order=priority&col=id&co
On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:14 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Carlos Nazareno
> wrote:
>
>>> AMD sees no Geode chip replacement in sight
>>> AMD on Monday said it has no replacement for the aging Geode low-
>>> power
>>> chips that are used in netbooks and set-top boxe
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Carlos Nazareno
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > AMD sees no Geode chip replacement in sight
>>> > AMD on Monday said it has no replacement for the aging Geode low
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote:
>>> AMD bought the Geode business from another company.
>
> National Semiconductor, which bought the line from Cyrix. I edited
> several of the pin- and register-level manuals for various chips for
> them more than ten years ago,
For Nation
2009/1/27 Benjamin M. Schwartz :
> Carlos Nazareno wrote:
>> Do ARM processors do these things better than anything else on the
>> market right now? but then you lose the X86 compatibility and this
>> probably breaks things for cross-platform upstream contributions for
>> any deved/researched write
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 19:26 -0800, John Gilmore wrote:
> > hey guys, here in Nepal we are deciding whether or not to turn off the
> > mesh on our custom XO build in order to save power. We will leave on
> > regular wifi.
> >
> > Any ideas on how much power we will actually save? An extra hour of
We are definitely recommending that they stop using MPP
mode (at least an automatic one.)
On Jan 23, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Michael Stone
> wrote:
>> http://dev.laptop.org/report/38
>
> A quick side-note here - reviewing the bugs listed t
37 matches
Mail list logo
