On Thursday 26 February 2009 05:09:27 pm James Cameron wrote:
> > Something is wrong with my olpc in either the xserver or hardware. For
> > other non-drawing tasks its speed seems to be reasonable.
>
> Yes, something is wrong. Have you another XO you can test?
>
I installed latest
xserver-xorg
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:50:58PM -0800, da...@lang.hm wrote:
>> since the effect seems to be related to the amount of text on the screen
>> at any one time that needs to be scrolled, it may be that the larger
>> fonts of debxo 0.5 are preventing you fr
Right, so I've
- moved some silly logs (do we need them?) from
/srv/library/mirror/log to /var/tmp/mirror-logs
- compressed the logs of the joyride builds
this has freed up some 345MB and I can work with that. A little bit at least.
Now, when I say
> better do some decent programming to handl
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> ... whoever looks after the build scripts that hog it
So, found a crontab entry hiding in root's entry, commented out so no
more joyride for the time being.
I'm not sure about the hw on that box before that script gets enabled
again, we n
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:50:58PM -0800, da...@lang.hm wrote:
> since the effect seems to be related to the amount of text on the screen
> at any one time that needs to be scrolled, it may be that the larger
> fonts of debxo 0.5 are preventing you from seeing the effect.
Good point, but no, rx
/srv is full on xsdev. I'll do some temporary shuffling around of my
stuff to clear up enough room to do what I need to do...
... whoever looks after the build scripts that hog it (is it joyride
builds?) better do some decent programming to handle the on-disk
footprint better _or_ some storage pla
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:18:46AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> As a wild guess, may be related to jffs2? It may be garbage
> collecting at that time or some other stuff.
Agreed, that is a possibility. I'm avoiding that by installing afresh,
not filling up the free space, doing nothing else on th
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:16:24AM -0800, Derek Zhou wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2009 12:02:46 am James Cameron wrote:
> >
> > I'm not seeing what you're seeing. Perhaps there is something else
> > affecting your system.
> >
>
> Agreed. Now instead of a logfile which is different from comp
Hal Murray wrote:
> Is there anything I can do on my XO running terminal so that when I ssh to
> another system and run a text based X program the fonts will come out useable
> without a magnifying glass?
If you RTFA, http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Terminal_Activity has a "Change
font size in the T
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Derek Zhou wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2009 12:02:46 am James Cameron wrote:
>> After generating an xorg.conf using "Xorg -configure", restarting X,
>> results were 3.696s, 3.700s, 3.607s.
>>
>> After adding 'Option "FBSize" "8388608"', restarting X, results were
>> 3.673
i'll be there if I can connect through my work's internet filter.
hopefully i can find a little time and churn out more svgs
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/ActivityTeam-meeting-tp2376013p2391377.html
Sent from the Software development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2009/2/9 Martin Langhoff :
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> So initially I am going with #1-- do you think you can tweak the
>> initrd a bit more to poke at ef01 over mesh, and ef02 over abg?
>> Looking at activate.py, adding it to the array in try_network()...
>
> New
2009/2/26 Martin Langhoff :
> Grab the 0.5.2-dev01 iso from http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/
>
> - @online@ should now work - please test with
> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/2009-February/002949.html
>
> - Daniel's enhancements and fixes to xs-activity-server are in there to
Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> da...@lang.hm wrote:
>>> It would allow for much improved
>>> video performance since you could play back a 320x240
>>> video on the full screen at considerable CPU savings.
>> except that you would spend those CPU savings doing the scaling up from
>> 320x240 to the
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> 2009/2/26 Dave Bauer :
> > I am using XS 0.5.1 beta. On there the moodle instance is not comfigured.
> > Should I expect it to work out of the box or are there additional steps I
> > need to take to get it working. The XS install docs don't
Why was it broken up, BTW? Can it be put back together? :) It's always
been confusing to me how the parts interact.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> On 26.02.2009, at 03:34, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31L9qaxOrp0
> >
> > This is a grea
benjamin m. schwartz wrote:
>
> There are lots of good reasons to play with screen resolution. My
> favorite reason is that reducing the resolution to 800x600 would make all
> graphical operations runs twice as fast, and use half as much memory,
> while introducing a negligible drop in displ
Ton van Overbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Ton van Overbeek wrote:
>>> When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty.
>>> Anybody else seen this ?
>>>
>>> Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a
>>> Soas-20090224
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Ton van Overbeek wrote:
>>
>> When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty.
>> Anybody else seen this ?
>>
>> Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a
>> Soas-200902241809.iso.
>> What is this ?
>
On 26.02.2009, at 03:34, Caroline Meeks wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31L9qaxOrp0
>
> This is a great demo!
>
> I'm trying it on Sugar on a Stick. It works well. Except I can't
> find a mic button nor can I see how to get to synth through an edit
> button as demonstrated in the vi
> I had thought this capability would be coming with
> the Fedora 10 move in 9.1.0. With that release now
> scuttled, I'm wondering more generally, are these
> pieces being picked up anywhere?
Well its not really scuttled, there will still be a equivalent release
at around the time that 9.1.0 was
If you need it for some game then here is how to do it: attached.
A little question to Jordan Crouse or anybody else who can answer.
Here Jodran told me that the Geode can do XV flipping:
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2007-May/005208.html
It can be that he either did not reflect to that
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:19, Derek Zhou wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2009 11:52:11 pm James Cameron wrote:
>> debxo 0.5 KDE variant booted from USB, installed rxvt, started "rxvt -fn
>> 12x24", maximised, took a sample log (dmesg) which was 523 lines,
>> appended it many times to generate a
On Thursday 26 February 2009 12:02:46 am James Cameron wrote:
> After generating an xorg.conf using "Xorg -configure", restarting X,
> results were 3.696s, 3.700s, 3.607s.
>
> After adding 'Option "FBSize" "8388608"', restarting X, results were
> 3.673s, 3.636s, 3.658s.
>
> The generated xorg.con
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:11, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Ton van Overbeek wrote:
>> When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty.
>> Anybody else seen this ?
>>
>> Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a
>> Soas-200902241809.iso.
>> What is this ?
>>
>>
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 11:52:11 pm James Cameron wrote:
> debxo 0.5 KDE variant booted from USB, installed rxvt, started "rxvt -fn
> 12x24", maximised, took a sample log (dmesg) which was 523 lines,
> appended it many times to generate a file 7322 lines long, then used:
>
> time cat f
Ton van Overbeek wrote:
> When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty.
> Anybody else seen this ?
>
> Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a
> Soas-200902241809.iso.
> What is this ?
>
> Is there a changelog or buildlog somewhere for the various Soas
After generating an xorg.conf using "Xorg -configure", restarting X,
results were 3.696s, 3.700s, 3.607s.
After adding 'Option "FBSize" "8388608"', restarting X, results were
3.673s, 3.636s, 3.658s.
The generated xorg.conf is attached.
I'm not seeing what you're seeing. Perhaps there is somethi
28 matches
Mail list logo
