Guylhem Aznar wrote:
> Approx timings from pressing on the power button on my test machine
> using an old 2.6.22 on a jffs2 partition
> 2 seconds with the screen turned off
>
There is very little that can be done to reduce that 2 seconds, which is
dominated by the time it takes to read the f
> I'm thinking about ext4, but I must confess that my experience with ext2
> has been pretty frustrating. The ext2/3 on-disk format has sprouted many
> new features over time. Supporting people who plug in disks that are
> formatted with the latest fancy feature, then complain that an old
> fi
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 05:34, Peter Robinson wrote:
> You also have to realise that a atom cpu with a gig of ram and a relatively
> fast SSD are hardware wise
> an order of magnitude faster than the current Gen 1 XO hardware.
Of course I do, but IMHO there are also some things that could
Hi Tiago,
> I have some questions to whom might be able to answer them.
> It would be cool to have that 2nd SD card slot(?) at the top
> available in the final design, are you considering that option?
No. That's where the wifi module will go, connected (electrically,
not mechanically) v
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > >> I tried to summarize the issues here:
>> > >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Bootanim
>> > >>
>> > >> is there more I should address? how would you avoid using
>> > >> VT_WAITACTIVE? I have some free time, so I can try to fix these ov
peter wrote:
> > hi peter --
> >
> > bootanim does both the boot-time animation and the shutdown
> > ul-warning screen. it does the boot animation in an extremely
> > efficient manner, shaving 10 or 11 seconds off our current boot
> > times:
>
> 10 or 11 seconds off what? the previous boo
> > >> I tried to summarize the issues here:
> > >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Bootanim
> > >>
> > >> is there more I should address? how would you avoid using
> > >> VT_WAITACTIVE? I have some free time, so I can try to fix these over
> > >> the next few days.
> > >
> > > In similar fashi
peter wrote:
> >> I tried to summarize the issues here:
> >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Bootanim
> >>
> >> is there more I should address? how would you avoid using
> >> VT_WAITACTIVE? I have some free time, so I can try to fix these over
> >> the next few days.
> >
> > In similar fashion
>> I tried to summarize the issues here:
>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Bootanim
>>
>> is there more I should address? how would you avoid using
>> VT_WAITACTIVE? I have some free time, so I can try to fix these over
>> the next few days.
>
> In similar fashion to this:
> http://www.brontes3d.com/o
2009/6/3 Bobby Powers :
> hey Dan,
>
> I tried to summarize the issues here:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Bootanim
>
> is there more I should address? how would you avoid using
> VT_WAITACTIVE? I have some free time, so I can try to fix these over
> the next few days.
In similar fashion to this:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> 2009/6/3 Tomeu Vizoso :
>> Maybe you are seeing the issue discussed here?
>>
>> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-May/024414.html
>
> I think so too, but an explanation of what is on the screen at the
> point of the hang would not go
daniel wrote:
> 2009/6/3 Tomeu Vizoso :
> > Maybe you are seeing the issue discussed here?
> >
> > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-May/024414.html
>
> I think so too, but an explanation of what is on the screen at the
> point of the hang would not go amiss.
>
> My tentative
2009/6/3 Tomeu Vizoso :
> Maybe you are seeing the issue discussed here?
>
> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-May/024414.html
I think so too, but an explanation of what is on the screen at the
point of the hang would not go amiss.
My tentative plans are to roll Bobby's new graphics wo
Yes, mostly as a safety precaution, especially when there will be a full
fledged Gnome Desktop and other heavier applications. The on-board flash is
a terrible place to accomodate SWAP, unless we end up with 8GiB and proper
wear levelling for the flash blocks.
1GB is a lot more than I would expect
bryan wrote:
> I am curious if a number of other deployments have encountered this
> problem or just us.
>
> We find that the XO occasionally hangs on shutdown. We are using 0.82
>
> I have created a ticket for this
>
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9319
>
> I realize that OLPC has rou
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 14:21, Bryan Berry wrote:
> I am curious if a number of other deployments have encountered this
> problem or just us.
>
> We find that the XO occasionally hangs on shutdown. We are using 0.82
>
> I have created a ticket for this
>
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9319
>
> I re
I am curious if a number of other deployments have encountered this
problem or just us.
We find that the XO occasionally hangs on shutdown. We are using 0.82
I have created a ticket for this
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9319
I realize that OLPC has roughly zero resources to fix problems like
th
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:26:34PM +0100, Tiago Marques wrote:
> I would have some uses for the slot, even if internal, like a SWAP
> device.
Even after the massive memory and flash size increase?
--
James Cameronmailto:qu...@us.netrek.org http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Tiago Marques wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>> I have some questions to whom might be able to answer them.
>> It would be cool to have that 2nd SD card slot(?) at the top available in
>> the final design, are you considering that option?
>>
>
>
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> What version of XO software are you running? Have you tried SOAS or
> one of the F11/rawhide test images to see if that improves speed at
> all over 8.2.1?
SoaS boot on XO-1 hw is fairly slow, but as you say it has more
potential than the F
>> Don't believe everything you read on a wiki.
>> OFW has included support for partitioned NAND since the first production
>> shipments, dating back to January 2008. The idea is to have a small
>> boot partition that can be in any format that OFW supports - JFFS2,
>> ext2, FAT, or even a .zip arc
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:59:41AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
>> this means you need to boot with vmalloc=. The
>> framebuffer needs to be vmalloc'ed. So if you have a relatively
>> small amount of RAM, and the BIOS is configured for 256MB
>> framebuffer s
22 matches
Mail list logo
