Congratulations on the merge.
> Note that currently there is nothing keeping anyone from installing a
> kernel meant for one gen machine on a different gen machine. Just
> don't do that. :)
Eventually if both machines are going to run a standard Fedora
release, the same binary kernel will have t
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
>> d) rewrite as an NSS module?
>> e) rewrite in an external DNS resolver?
>
> Either of these would make it much easier to play with your patch,
> eliminating the whole "now recompile your C library from scratch"
> step. ;-)
Pff. It got us t
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:24:35 -0400
Bobby Powers wrote:
[...]
>
> this is great, thanks! being able to build rpms like that again is
> quite handy. I know its not under your job description Deepak, but do
> you know of a similar way to build debs, or documentation on that
> process?
>
You shoul
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>
> I've spent some time merging the XO-1 and XO-1.5 kernels into a new
> branch and made some tweaks to the in-kernel RPM build scripts. From
> now on, all development for both XO-1 and XO-1.5 will be done on the
> olpc-2.6.30 branch of the olpc
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:45 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
>> The process is doing a linear read through the file, and is slow
>> enough that it appears only to grow. But if I run another process that
>> allocates a lot of memory, then the kernel does discard pages pages.
>
> So are you saying that two id
> The process is doing a linear read through the file, and is slow
> enough that it appears only to grow. But if I run another process that
> allocates a lot of memory, then the kernel does discard pages pages.
So are you saying that two identical processes that mmap large amounts
of memory, (much
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
> d) rewrite as an NSS module?
> e) rewrite in an external DNS resolver?
Either of these would make it much easier to play with your patch,
eliminating the whole "now recompile your C library from scratch"
step. ;-) (d) would be the cleanest,
I've spent some time merging the XO-1 and XO-1.5 kernels into a new
branch and made some tweaks to the in-kernel RPM build scripts. From
now on, all development for both XO-1 and XO-1.5 will be done on the
olpc-2.6.30 branch of the olpc-2.6 repository [1]. As Linus releases
new kernels, I will b
John -
Thanks for keeping this on the radar. I have a pair on order (one
with keyboard, one without) in the hopes of both doing some
experimenting and trying out that USB host/host connection glue, too.
I'll let the list know when we get them here at 1CC to play with -
they're pre-ordere
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:23 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Had some time to retest this on the plane, and I think it was
> mis-diagnosis. The original code I was testing is lost. In re-testing
> this I find that the problem is more nuanced, and I may have been
> wrong: looking at 'top', the kernel
10 matches
Mail list logo
